Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Borders files for bankruptcy


Jangler

Recommended Posts

http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2011/02/16/borders-bankruptcy-what-went-wrong/

Borders filed for bankruptcy protection today, turning what had been a business success story (small-town bookstore turns crazy successful national mega-retailer) into a cautionary tale.

Some of Borders’ problems weren’t the company’s fault. There are now hundreds of places to buy books online or in physical bookstores. That forces all book sellers to compete over price.

And, of course, Borders made a lot of mistakes, too: Ill-fated expansion plans, too many stores that lose money and being late to realize the popularity of electronic books.

Too Many Unprofitable Stores

This is a big lodestone. Borders is planning to close 200 or more of its stores -– about 30% of its current locations –- because too many stores lose money. Borders said the stores it plans to close are draining $2 million a week out of the company’s profits.

Borders said it “found that they…have a number of stores which are simply unprofitable and are substantially impacting the [company’s] overall performance and ability to pay their debts.” Borders said the store closures will leave the company with a “sizable core” of profitable stores.

Bad Economy and Changing Book Business

Borders said people have been less willing to spend money on optional purchases like books and music, and the company is facing more competition in book selling. Think about how many places now you can buy a physical or digital book – everywhere from the grocery store to Amazon.com to your mobile phone.

Borders also said the book retailing business has experienced little or no growth in recent years. And Borders is now forced to compete fiercely over price of books, DVDs and other goods it sells, even as people are buying more digital books, digital movies and music

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is just Panthers history pain speaking.
    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
×
×
  • Create New...