Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For What It's Worth....


NanceUSMC

Recommended Posts

I still prefer Green, because I feel like we're going to be losing Steve Smith soon but I also understand that going in with a purely green receiving corps is recipe for a disaster.

I like Peterson a lot - he would basically solidify our secondary enormously.

Dareus I don't know enough about, but I understand the need at DT. It's just such an unsexy position to draft I have trouble getting into it... but I would certainly be happy if we did fill that need.

The Green pick could make sense if Smith definitely wants out. That would establish our receivers as a good group and with a vet Qb next year we could be okay. It would shore up the receivers position for the next 5-10 years. I think some of it would be looking at whether DT, corner, etc could be worked on further down in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still prefer Green, because I feel like we're going to be losing Steve Smith soon but I also understand that going in with a purely green receiving corps is recipe for a disaster.

I like Peterson a lot - he would basically solidify our secondary enormously.

Dareus I don't know enough about, but I understand the need at DT. It's just such an unsexy position to draft I have trouble getting into it... but I would certainly be happy if we did fill that need.

If we lose Steve Smith before the draft, it will be because he was traded for more picks, and there are some very good WR's that can be had later.

I just don't like taking a WR at #1 anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would rather take a DE than a DT. QB's and pass-rushers are the most important guys on the field. Dareus is solid but not an elite pass-rusher a la Suh.

I think Dareus will be a very good pass rusher and won't give up running lanes either.

We have Johnson, Hardy and Brown at the DE and it's really not a need, whereas DT is our biggest need on D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would rather take a DE than a DT. QB's and pass-rushers are the most important guys on the field. Dareus is solid but not an elite pass-rusher a la Suh.

Our DE position is not a significant area of need, but that train of thought is why people have us taking Bowers in mocks.

The Green pick could make sense if Smith definitely wants out. That would establish our receivers as a good group and with a vet Qb next year we could be okay. It would shore up the receivers position for the next 5-10 years. I think some of it would be looking at whether DT, corner, etc could be worked on further down in the draft.

This is my thinking. I just am not in love with the prospects at the QB position. I really like Gabbert, but I do not want him at #1. I like the prospects of Newton but overall I just do not want to invest the #1 overall in a guy who you can't really expect to start right away.

I have heard that CB and DT are both deep this draft. I really wish we had a second, because we could pick up some good value there. Still, there WILL be good players available in the third.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only things I really see working against Green (who I love as a WR by the way), is that we addressed the position so heavily last year, and that Smith doesn't have a history of being the best teammate to help groom and teach younger players at his position (or any position for that matter)... There have been multiple reports that he has thrown teammates under the bus (whether needed or otherwise), reports that his behavior helped contribute to the downfall of Colbert and Jarrett, reports that he couldn't coexist with other high profile players in the locker room that threatened his place in the spotlight, and the list goes on and on... Don't get me wrong, I'm a Smitty fan, but if I'm making a high pick, I'm taking this into account before i spend it on a WR that may get assaulted (mentally, verbally, physically, etc) by a teammate that most would hope would help him learn the ropes...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I did a lot of research on Xavier Legette for the past few weeks, and as some of you know, I was in favor of making him our first pick. I must say that I got tired of going back and forth seemingly every other day about X, and was so ready for the draft to come in order for the team to "put up or shut up" where X was concerned, and enable discussions on X to move forward. X was (is) the most polarizing player discussed on the Huddle in terms pick 33, and that brought a lot of contentious discussion as well as information. See, you never know what to believe during the draft season, and ever since the Senior Bowl, hints and outright stories of the Panthers' and X's mutual attraction appeared and ramped up so easily, that it was almost unbelievable. So, even though I liked X, and really figured that he should be the pick, the ease of which everything fell into place and the outside noise of different analysts made me lose a little conviction. But one ex-scout developed unshakable conviction all the way through.  Dan Kelly, who used to scout for the Jets back in the day, chose Xavier Legette as the top receiver in the 2024 draft class. I came across his thoughts weeks ago, but I'm sharing them now just to give you some positive food for thought since X is indeed a Panther. There is no boom-or-bust aspect to X in Kelly's estimation, as X is reminiscent of a damned good one. "This Gamecocks receiver conjures memories of how Pro Football Hall of Fame wide receiver Art Monk — the former Washington star — ran his routes." "Legette's sudden and spontaneous moves win initial route leverage against corners and then he wins again at route breakpoints." For as critical as some have been of X's release off the line, when I look at X work, I can't say that Kelly is wrong here. X certainly seems to get open (though admittedly sometimes he just out-physicals the DBs ). "Legette is the best in this draft class at "Mossin'" defenders — that is acrobatically outjumping corners for passes and coming down with circus catches. Legette isn't the next Moss, but he is darn good. He can go deep or sell the deep route well before settling back underneath and making those vitally important chain-moving intermediate-level receptions (11-19 yards)." https://www.yardbarker.com/nfl/articles/scouts_view_the_top_receiver_in_the_nfl_draft_isnt_who_you_think/s1_13132_39987216 On Kelly's own site, First Round Mock, he was a little more specific: "Legette has this spontaneous and impulsive ability to put little moves on corners, whether releasing from the line of scrimmage...or...when going deep. Either way, it’s enough to earn Legette route leverage (position advantage against the cornerback he’s matched up against)." There's that term again: route leverage. Say what you want about X, but he knows how to get it. Lastly, within the scouting report, Kelly really mentions the term again without saying it. "Strong target who showed high-level receiving skills beyond his years...Runs routes to get open rather than well-defined routes which makes him tough to cover. Gets to the spot..." That's ironic, no? X in his roughness makes it ugly for defensive backs to cover him. For me, this was an epiphany when I was looking at some of his clips. Yeah, he may not be the technician that a Diontae Johnson or (dare I say) a Ladd McConkey is, but he always seemed to get where he needed to be. He just simply is not built to be bullied or redirected from the task at hand, and I don't think that's a characteristic or talent (if you will) that can be taught. Sure, he'll be polished up as best that the coaches can, and perhaps that will allow him a smoother release. And I'm sure that the coaches will devise ways to scheme him open, but he's built---physically and mentally to get to where he's going. You saw it last season, and you're going to see it in the pros. Watch what I'm saying. https://firstroundmock.com/2024/02/xavier-legette-reminds-former-nfl-scout-of-these-legends/
    • This is from his draft / combine profile from NFL.com.   https://www.nfl.com/prospects/austin-corbett/3200434f-5200-8097-d4cb-2bd53a7e3b55   Overview Corbett won't blow you away with any of his measurables or play traits, but he's solid in most areas. Corbett is definitely sharp enough to move inside to guard or even center and has good technique, but his average to below average play strength and lack of length may be a concern. He has the size and talent to compete for a guard/center spot early on, but he may elevate above an average starter during his career.   Sources Tell Us "He's smart and just solid all the way around. Long time starter in the league. I think he'll end up at center." - AFC offensive line coach
    • Our own PP won't be held to 9% this go round either.... I think the PK was a bit of an anomaly agaist the Isles...  
×
×
  • Create New...