Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Players of Interest / Free Agency and Trades


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

The most obvious name here is going to be Albert Haynesworth. I'm still iffy on him. Yes, he's shown the ability to be dominant when he wants to be. He's also shown the tendency to be average when he's not in a contract year and the potential to be very stupid in a heated situation. Make no mistake, he's a gamble, and an expensive one. The last time the team gambled on a franchise level DT in free agency, it didn't go so well.

Nnamdi Asomugha is the other name everyone is salivating over. The Raiders are still deciding whether to use the franchise tag on him or punter Shane Lechler (no, I'm not kidding). Even if he isn't franchised, he'd be out-the-wazoo expensive. The more likely scenario for getting him would be a swap with Peppers, a scenario that would have Peppers haters laughing their butts off. I'm still unsure I'd want that as a resolution.

Similarly, Anquan Boldin is a big name that can only be had by trade. Steve Smith's supposed lobbying aside, the Cardinals are digging their heels in so it seems unlikely he'll be traded unless someone makes a really great offer. Peppers for Boldin makes some sense for both sides, but I'd be shocked to see it.

If you're looking for less obvious names, there's guys like Mark Tauscher from the Packers. He's been a starting left tackle in the past, and depending on his current status could be a stopgap if Gross were lost or (more likely) decent veteran depth to make up for the loss of someone like Geoff Hangartner. Edwin Mulitalo is likely cheaper and could be had right now, mind you, but Tauscher is worth a shot.

Looking again to Green Bay, an old preseason Panthers favorite is now a restricted free agent. CB Jarrett Bush has seen some work at safety in Green Bay but has contributed mostly as a special teamer. The Packers could match an offer to him but there'd likely be no compensation owed if they didn't (unless they put a higher tender on him, which would be surprising).

The biggest in-house issues are, of course, what happens to Julius Peppers and Jordan Gross. Conventional wisdom is Gross gets the contract he wants while Peppers gets franchised and traded. Keep watching the update sites for the next few weeks on this one. If Gross isn't signed prior to the tagging deadline, the Panthers will have a tough decision to make there.

On the homefront, don't overlook the importance of keeping reserves like Geoff Hangartner and Frank Omiyale. Hangartner is at least somewhat likely to get offered a starter's job and money elsewhere, but don't assume that means he's gone. People said the same thing a few years ago about Al Wallace but the team kept him in the fold.

This year's annual midnight vigil could be interesting depending on how things play out between now and then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more likely scenario for getting him would be a swap with Peppers, a scenario that would have Peppers haters laughing their butts off. I'm still unsure I'd want that as a resolution.

I would love to see this happen. The main problem I see, though, is that Peppers would not be willing to sign a long term deal. I don't know that the Raiders would give up NA for what could be a one year rental. But then again, it is the Raiders...

PS: As an aside, under the newly micromanaged huddle board, this "players of interest" post should technically be under the stickied post of the same name, made by the same user. Although personally, I like being able to post new topics about relevant issues without having them merged into the stickies, which tend to get bogged down with too many different subjects put under one very general topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS: As an aside, under the newly micromanaged huddle board, this "players of interest" post should technically be under the stickied post of the same name, made by the same user. Although personally, I like being able to post new topics about relevant issues without having them merged into the stickies, which tend to get bogged down with too many different subjects put under one very general topic.

Doesn't matter to me, honestly. I thought a separate thread for free agent targets would be worthwhile, but if it were merged I wouldn't scream.

Agree about the Raiders. He does still have to agree, though the team can trade his "rights" but another team wouldn't accept that unconditionally.

It's probably worth taking a look at who the defensive free agents are from the Colts, Texans, Rams and whatever team our DL coach comes from. It'd be logical for the recently acquired members of our coaching staff to put in a "good word" for a guy they'd worked with before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IDK if anyone else saw this: it talks about how Pats could trade Cassel and then use those picks and their first to make a run at Asomugha.

http://www.examiner.com/x-1324-New-England-Patriots-Examiner~y2009m2d11-Patriots-should-make-a-play-for-Raiders-CB-Nnamdi-Asomugha

I think if we landed him and trade Lucas (atleast a 4th or 5th), and then sign a reliable DE-Berry maybe, Canty, or Olshansky. Then draft DT Hood (mizz) or Moala (usc).

This would sure up Coverage and give depth/support to our D-Line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure we could get anything for Lucas. He's lost a step, but still has a big contract. Not only that, but teams will be waiting for us to release him if they have any interest at all. Then, they could grab him out of free agency for a much cheaper price.

I'm afraid Ken Lucas has cap casualty written all over him. Unless, of course, he restructures ... but I don't see that as being likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree wholeheartedly with Scot on Hangman. They NEED to keep that kid. Would be happy to see them keep FO also since he can play LT and LT only from what I have understood. He fared well in the 2 (or was it 3??) games he played though one was against KC which had no pass rush to speak of last year. He did a nice job vs Atl though.

To me, there is no point spending all that $$ to get N.A. unless they improve the front 4. I can't see the Pats doing something like that to get any CB either no matter how great he is when they need LB help desperately and have 2 young CBs they seem to like who were showing promise last year as rookies when they got hurt .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see the Pats doing something like that to get any CB either no matter how great he is when they need LB help desperately and have 2 young CBs they seem to like who were showing promise last year as rookies when they got hurt .

New England doesn't typically go for the high dollar guy at any position on defense (see Milloy, Lawyer and Law, Ty for details). They seem to be really good at taking good parts and making them better as a whole.

Geez, I wish our team could do that. The Panthers tend to take great players and make them lesser as a whole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh but they do spend...on their DL. Seymour has a huge, huge contract. Warren and Wilfork were both 1st rounders like Seymour. They also will spend on LBs (Thomas and Colvin as FAs, pretty good dollars when they went there). Those are the smart postitions to spend on. Law had a HUGE contract that was put in place before BB and Pioli got there. They then went on to win a SB with Troy Brown the WR at nickel and a UDFA and a 4th rounder @ CB. Average CBs are fine when you have the hosses in the front 7. Heck the furthest the Cats ever got was probably the year under Fox with the worst CBs talent wise (2003).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Folks might want to rethink any scenario involving Chris Canty.

Canty wants a Tommy Kelly contract

The Raiders signed defensive lineman Tommy Kelly to a seven-year, $50.5 million contract ($18.125 million guaranteed) last winter that raised a lot of eyebrows around the league. That deal would be the starting point for negotiations if the Cowboys want to keep Chris Canty from determining his value in the open market.

"It'd have to start somewhere around there, if not higher," said Brad Blank, Canty's agent. "We talked very briefly last summer at that level, and [the Cowboys] didn't seem very interested."

Someone will suggest that this is just because he wants out of Dallas. That's possible, but I wouldn't count on it. And while there are positives about him, I'm no really sure he's worth that kind of money.

As a side note, frigging Raiders :cuss:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NA will be 28 at the start of the season. I would rather not invest huge amounts in a DB that will be in his 7th year this upcoming.

Boldin is not coming here. The only way I see him coming this way, is if Moose has decided to hang them up, and is being very quiet about it, giving the FO a chance to make a move. Highly unlikely.

We can't afford Canty.

And sadly, because I have always liked him, Lucas will either have to restructure, or face getting cut. Sad but true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh but they do spend...on their DL. Seymour has a huge, huge contract. Warren and Wilfork were both 1st rounders like Seymour. They also will spend on LBs (Thomas and Colvin as FAs, pretty good dollars when they went there). Those are the smart postitions to spend on. Law had a HUGE contract that was put in place before BB and Pioli got there. They then went on to win a SB with Troy Brown the WR at nickel and a UDFA and a 4th rounder @ CB. Average CBs are fine when you have the hosses in the front 7. Heck the furthest the Cats ever got was probably the year under Fox with the worst CBs talent wise (2003).

If you have good CB talent you can get by with a ok line as well but when both underperform you get what we had last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People seem to be overlooking our biggest problem right now QB! Not DL, not our secondary, and not our O-line. Gross will be back he wants to win hes not all about money i mean he wants to get paid (n he will) but he wants to be on a winning team.

I want Cassel. Cassel put up Tom Brady numbers last year with no running game. Get rid of Jake! (Frees cap room) Peps wants to play in a 3-4 and theres few better places to play in a 3-4 then new england. Our Defense and running game got us 12-4 and our passing game like usual lossed us a SB run and we all should know that!

I want to win now not 3 years from now this team is about 2 pieces away from a big run and cassel would help immediately.

Cassel, Smith, Moose, Williams, Stewart, Rosario, n the big Uglys. Thats a recipy for the Panthers getting our first RING!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Then don't tune in. It's really not a hard concept to understand, if your making your decision based on your own personal needs/feelings as opposed to what is best for the future of the franchise, then it's a you problem, not a Panthers problem. When the season is already lost, every fan should be rooting for the same thing.  The team plays hard until the final whistle of the season and keeps improving as a team and individually, but in the end, we still come up short and lose games, and preferably because the other team beat us, not because we screwed up and found a way to lose due to our own fault. Look at it this way... If we are up 1 or 2 points with 3 seconds left in the game and the other team is lining up for a FG.  Beyond the joy of victory or the disappointment of defeat, what impact does the other team making or missing the FG have on our team the following season? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Except where we draft and what teams we play due to our finish in the division. The players and coaches on the team would have the exact same level of improvement and learnings about themselves individually and as a team whether the FG is made or missed.  The ONLY difference in the end is the record in the standings and if the win or loss number changes. If you want to argue if making the playoffs to lose in the first round or just missing them is better or worse, that's totally fair and I can at least understand the other side of it.  But in what is already a lost season, if you're not hoping your team plays well but ends up losing, then you're cutting off your nose to spite your face.  You're hoping for a moment of happiness at the detriment of the franchise's future, and in turn, you're basically then happy for a moment to only set yourself up for future further disappointment.
    • If we’re eliminated I want the wins more.   The season is already a disappointment and if I’m not pulling for wins why bother to tune in?
    • Two things terribly wrong with this post. First is that not one time has myself or anyone else agreeing with me said that the team themselves should think that way or try and lose for positioning.  Never once have I suggested the team should purposefully lose games, ever.  I honestly can't understand why people keep saying this in posts, not one fan has ever said the players should or would purposefully try to lose. And second, is yes, that has happened and it's happened very recently.  The 2020 Bengals were 4-11-1 and then were playing in the SB the very next season.   And while it might have been 2 years later and they didn't quite get to the SB, the 2021 Lions were 3-13-1 and then the 2023 Lions were up 24-7 at halftime of the NFC Championship game. The season between those two? They finished 9-8 and only just missed the playoffs. Which is why I keep trying to compare us to the Lions in where we are at in our re-build.  Throw out Bryce's rookie year with the Reich staff who just didn't work out and he looked god awful.   This past season when we were 5-12 in Canales' 1st season is that 2021 season for the Lions and their 1st season under Campbell.  This year is their 2022 where they grew a ton and Campbell's culture building was clear, where I'm saying we'd likely be better off in the long run if we go 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss out on the playoffs (which is still a significant improvement from last year).  Then our 2026 is their 2024 when we have a chance to be a real contender after adding a few more pieces and our key players having another year of experience under their belts.
×
×
  • Create New...