Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

20-year-old woman MX Police Chief


Carolina Mike II

Recommended Posts

WTF do you think Heroin comes from? :rolleyes:

Heroin is not natural, it is not opium, they are not the same they are extremely different, there is a lack of education. I have done both drugs, I have done all drugs. I have that luxury, to not have it destroy a future which isn't there. Heroin is completely different than opium and if you think differently you're extremely wrong. Research it. Opium is much milder, much less addicting and 100% natural. Not only is it documented in early ages to be useful, but even now days it is used in hospitals. Heroin isn't and heroin does not have a history other than the drug market. If your point is if we legalize opium then heroin will be abundant I will tell you this that all the necessary ingredients for Meth can be bought for pennies. Opium is cheap, real cheap, heroin is not at all. If opium was so damaging and could do what heroin does this would not be the case. If it were even close, people who were addicted would go to opium instead and drive its market up, but they do not because it just isn't the same . I don't advise doing drugs but its hard to explain and the best I could say is try them both to get a real understanding.

I have done both drugs, over a period of time. Opium is a much softer drug than heroin and I know it's natural for people to classify them together but until you have tried each and personally felt the effects, you can't say. I felt addicted to heroin almost immediately, opium not even close to that feeling. That is the problem with society is all these people who have never done drugs are making laws for them. Like someone making a speeding sign for a road they have never driven. Times will change, unfortunately I doubt I'll still be around by then, but sometimes I take advantage now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somehow I have a hard time buying that the thugs, cutthroats and murderers currently running the drug cartels would just play nice or turn into respectable businessman if their product were to be legalized. Nor do I buy that it would automatically put them out of business.

They might change their methods, but they'd still be the same people.

After prohibition ended, many bootleggers went out of business. Not all of them, but many of them did.

No, they definitely wouldn't change. But if corporations are allowed to provide for the needs of narcotics consumers, their demand will dry up. And no demand equals funds running out eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heroin is not natural, it is not opium, they are not the same they are extremely different, I have done both drugs, I have done all drugs. I have that luxury, to not have it destroy a future which isn't there. Heroin is completely different than opium and if you think differently you're extremely wrong. Research it. Opium is much milder, much less addicting and 100% natural. Not only is it documented in early ages to be useful, but even now days it is used in hospitals. If your point is if we legalize opium then heroin will be abundant I will tell you this that all the necessary ingredients for Meth can be bought for pennies. Opium is cheap, real cheap, heroin is not at all. If opium was so damaging and could do what heroin does this would not be the case. If it were even close, people who were addicted would go to opium instead and drive its market up, but they do not because it just isn't the same . I don't advise doing drugs but its hard to explain and the best I could say is try them both to get a real understanding.

I have done both drugs, over a period of time. Opium is a much softer drug than heroin and I know it's natural for people to classify them together but until you have tried each and personally felt the effects, you can't say. I felt addicted to heroin almost immediately, opium not even close to that feeling. That is the problem with society is all these people who have never done drugs are making laws for them. Like someone making a speeding sign for a road they have never driven. Times will change, unfortunately I doubt I'll still be around by then, but sometimes I take advantage now.

there is a lack of education

Your telling me, another one that thinks because they have "Consumed" drugs they're are an expert.

:rolleyes:

Heroin does not have a history other than the drug market.

Wrong

if your point is if we legalize opium then heroin will be abundant I will tell you this that all the necessary ingredients for Meth can be bought for pennies

Yeah... meth isn't a problem in this country :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After prohibition ended, many bootleggers went out of business. Not all of them, but many of them did.

No, they definitely wouldn't change. But if corporations are allowed to provide for the needs of narcotics consumers, their demand will dry up. And no demand equals funds running out eventually.

The mafia didn't go out of business though, and the cartels are way closer to the mafia than common bootleggers.

No way those guys go quietly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...