Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Console games are dying?


88 Bronco

Recommended Posts

Gaming is just in the pooter right now, period, on pc and console. Not much to look forward to but a bunch of retread "sequels" that are little more than expansions or episodic content.

I am interested in Rage though.

that's why i'm still playing demon's souls and replaying HL2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry. In over 20 years of waiting, I'm convinced there will never be a boxing game that can hold Mike Tyson's Punch-Out's jock.

Modern consoles are more like PCs than you think. The advantage for consoles is that the hardware and software is the same. When you're playing a game online, you know your opponents have the same hardware. Faster reflexes, not faster hardware, determines the outcome.

You're insane. Fight Night Champion blows that old poo out of the water.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm almost thru with hl2 for the 2nd time. I got to the part where you lead the squad through City 17 and got bored and quit. :|

I have that issue with games, getting bored with them and quitting them right before they're finished.

yea, i do that too. it's usually because the conclusions arent laid out well and are subpar compared to the rest of the game.

playing Dragon Age's last battle i turned the difficulty all the way down simply because i got bored fighting a f*cking dragon for 30 minutes and then getting spammed by the game.

*wow that was incoherent*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Consoles don't die, rather their generation dies instead. So they create a new console, a new generation. It may not be for a couple years but a new console will come out. I think consoles are becoming more and more like computers. I don't however think that one will replace the other. There are simply application that cater to both. Would you want to type something on a TV? Hell no. DO you want to memory capacity and system capabilities of a PC on a big screen without hooking up a third foreign source. Hell yes.

Personally, to answer the question honestly I personally believe it is not dying it is becoming a fad. But it is dying in other ways. Because of becoming so popular, there is not a lot of time or revolutionary thought put into 95% of the games released. People are rarely experimenting, pushing the limits and taking time to create something truly special and in this perspective games are very surely dying. Now people are just making games to sell them and make some sort of profit. Mainstream wants graphics at expensive of anything else like value, they want customization instead of system performance, they want a cookie cutter story so it doesn't 'waste time' (ironic how anyone could possibly want this in a.... video game) let alone actual brain power to comprehend and play for that matter.

I am on the verge of 10 page essay here so I'll just stop there. So yes and no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is an event called the "Video Game Crash of 1983". A major component to that failure was oversaturation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_video_game_crash_of_1983

And the industry is doing it again. Perfect example:

Guitar Hero I-III (maybe IV) were cool. But all the back to back sequels and spin offs has killed the title.

The video game industry is focusing on quantity, not quality. There is NO reason why the next gen of games hasn't emerged. Except, the video game companies simply want the most money for least R&D time.

Want to see an example of next-gen video games?

http://www.infinity-universe.com/Infinity/index.php

Procedural programming is used to create a small galaxy sized environment. It's potential is complete immersion. I can't imagine what the guy could do with a production company's budget.

If another crash happens, something else will come along like Nintendo did to bring back interest.

Sorry. In over 20 years of waiting, I'm convinced there will never be a boxing game that can hold Mike Tyson's Punch-Out's jock.

Damn straight!

Gaming is just in the pooter right now, period, on pc and console. Not much to look forward to but a bunch of retread "sequels" that are little more than expansions or episodic content.

I agree. You realize that if we, the consumer, got wise to this and quit buying this type of poo, then game designers might start getting a bit more creative and innovative. We might start getting games that are truly original more often. Right now, designers and publishers are scared to take risks. The same old same old is gauranteed to make money. People need to quit buying Madden EACH and EVERY YEAR. Madden '08 is fine (I don't need '9/'10/and '11), just download an updated roster each year. We need to start supporting and buying games that are different and new. It's not gonna change until the consumer wises up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exhibit A of why Woods was cut....   Trying to shoulder knockdown the best WR in the NFL ends up with air   Also not sure what the h*ll coverage Horn was playing but covering nothibg after a poo jam 
    • I'm just telling you what the team is currently looking at. Aho, Jarvis, Staal, KK as the four centers in that order as of right now.  Obviously id prefer them to go get McTavish but the asking price is pretty damn high. 
    • Summary Austin Corbett being named a starter already might be strategic because it allows the team to have Cade Mays compete to play LG if Damien Lewis continues to have shoulder issues going into the season. Brady Christensen is most valuable to the team as the sixth-man/swing tackle for the OL and having him start a game at guard only to have to kick out to tackle (should there be an injury) is less than ideal. Was the weakest link on the OL when he was the starting LG and though he has short arms he is too athletic and so good in space that playing him at tackle is better. RT makes more sense as it's brawn-on-brawn more than it is on the weakside where somebody like Princely Umanmielen can out-athletic him. Cade Mays provides similar versatility that Christensen does, but can stick to the interior while Brady stays on the outside (unless, Lord forbid, there's multiple injuries that requires Mays + Christensen on the interior and Nijman to takeover at OT). Kaye thinks that the only keep two QBs on the roster and while he's seen some of the angst that Andy Dalton caused from the preseason opener but through the first two weeks of training camp he looked like he could be in the conversation if there was a competition for QB1. Not because of any lacking one Bryce's behalf, but just based on the great looks he's given the second-team defense. He's lofted balls into the endzone including a big TD to Coker. Also threw about 45yds through the air to TJ Luther for a TD. Zietlow empathizes with the fans because they can't see anything from training camp. Mike has the team keeping three RBs with Raheem Blackshear as the odd-man out with Etienne set to take over as one of the two returners. Former Ragin' Cajun and Horned Frog Emani Bailey has looked good running the ball in the last couple of practices as well as during the preseason opener. Likely priority practice squad candidate. Thinks that the team should only keep six WRs in order to take an extra OL or DL into the season, but summoning his inner Eric Eager Kaye doesn't see how they justify not keeping seven WRs without a trade. Doesn't think if it's a failure if a trade can't come to fruition to move that seventh WR if they do that. Loves what he's seeing out of McMillan, Coker, and Legette. TMac is starting to surge and Jimmy Horn Jr might be the lead punt returner. With the team being so light on quality special teams players, David Moore might be somebody that they can cut and bring back. All of the WRs further down the roster are also making plays (lists Tremayne, Luther, and George). Alex likes their initial numbers: two QBs, three RBs, and seven WRs. Mike points out that with seven WRs there's no way the team takes four TEs. Will Tremble be healthy and if not who makes the roster while he recovers? James Mitchell has looked good and like it might be him if that's the route. Poses the question of do they take 10 OL? Probably going to have eight active on game day but with DLew's injury, TMo's history, Hunt getting dinged up recently in practice, Corbett's back-to-back season ending injuries creates a legitimate conversation about whether or not they go into the season with ten OL and then try to stash one on the practice squad afterwards. Couple of minutes of debate over the classification of the word hero... Don't have LaBryan Ray, Shy Tuttle, nor Akayleb Evans on their final 53. Quick intermission as they bring on The Houston Chronicle's Jonathan Alexander (formerly of The Charlotte Observer where he was once the Panthers' beat reporter). JA thinks that some of the critique of CJ's game last season was overblown but also understands that folks want to see growth from year one to year two rather than regression but he still had some good moments. Still had a decent TD:INT ratio (20:12) and was listed at #39 in the recent NFL Top 100. Texans were dealing with a lot of injuries early in the summer: Joe Mixon has a foot issue from an off-field injury, Nick Chubb is returning from a season ending injury and recently came back from a concussion as well, Dameon Pierce who is coming back from a quad injury and just recently practiced in full for the first time, Dare Ogunbowale is their do-it-all guy (including emergency kicker), and they drafted Woody Marks out of USC in the 4th round of the 2025 draft. The team might even try to sneak five RBs on to the roster. Chubb isn't a guarantee to make the roster with how much they like Pierce, Dare, and recently invested a 4th in Marks. Talked issues in the secondary after CJGJ's injury and Jimmie Ward's felony assault charge. CJGJ injury was really tough even though he'll come back at some point during the season. Stingley and Lassiter provides them with two lockdown outside CBs. Kaylin Bulock is a ball hawk that struggles in the run game but Jaylen Petri is one of the best hitters/blitzers at the nickel position in the league (though he gives up some in the pass game). They're still going to be strong in the secondary even without CJGJ. DL is one of the best in the league. Will Anderson Jr and Danielle Hunter on the outside with a deeper DT room. DL + secondary are the strongest areas of the defense. Houston WR room has a lot of names that even casual football fans know of (Nico Collins, Christian Kirk, Tank Dell, John Metchie III, Braxton Berrios, both of the Iowa State WRs, etc). Main four are Collins, Kirk, Higgins (Iowa St), and Noel (Iowa St). Open competition for the remaining two to three spots depending on what Berrios has done since coming back from injury. If Berrios is good to go, they could keep seven. John Metchie III, Xavier Hutchinson (a former Iowa St WR himself), and Justin Watson (former Chief) are all competing for those remaining spots with Berrios. Rookie contract guarantees have been getting deeper and deeper every year, so when Higgins was drafted the Texans didn't want to deal with the back-and-forth so they just guaranteed the full deal. Asked about what the external view of Bryce Young is outside of the Carolinas. Jonathan says that the league respects Bryce and the Texans do especially. CJ and him are close, Will Anderson is close with Bryce, Henry Too'too is close with Bryce, Metchie is close with Bryce. Whenever they're asked about him they show nothing but love, including saying that he was going to turn things around in Carolina. Folks around the organization and others outside of Carolina around the league feel like the Panthers didn't put the necessary tools around Bryce in his rookie season. They gave him the tools in his second season, but it was all about his confidence then. They think he's going to be one of the better QBs in the league for a long time. End of Jonathan's segment. Back to just Mike and Alex. Roster bets! Can't be guys that you know are going to be on the roster or win jobs. Outside of the kicker competition there isn't too many positions up in the air. Of the guys in the 45 - 55 range, stake their claim on who they think will make the roster. MK starts with Jaden Crumedy, last year's sixth-round pick. Likes what he's been doing in the run game, feels like he complements DB well. A'Shawn Robinson is complemented by Turk Wharton and Bobby Brown III is complemented by Cam Jackson. AZ points out how Crumedy played in five different defensive schemes in college. AZ goes with Ja'Tyre Carter. He had a solid rest of the game after giving up his initial sack which wasn't exactly egregious. This training camp has shown how important OL depth is and with how much has been invested they're going to want to make sure to keep the strength a strength (especially with three of the five starters already dinged up). Could make the roster as OL10. He's serviceable and part of a group that needs as much depth as possible, so sees the logic in keeping him. MK's next pick... Thomas Incoom. He's been terrific at practice on defense and was solid against the Browns on special teams. Doesn't see why DJ Johnson would be kept over Incoom as the latter is a better pass rusher and a much, much better ST contributor (doesn't hurt that he's outperformed DJ Johnson in every which way). Pointed out a play where DJ Johnson froze up on a reverse when he's supposed to be a good run defender. They've put a lot in and while Evero was pro-DJ Johnson, he was ultimately a selection of the previous regime. Pointed out Brandt Tillis' comments about not cutting Turk Wharton because it would lose the team trying to stash him rather than fielding the best 53 players. Morgan + Tillis don't benefit from storing a player that they didn't draft, and Incoom brings so much on special teams while also providing a pass rush despite needing to improve against the run. AZ's pick... Nick Scott. Both agree that he's a special teamer and a back-up, but Scott also brings a legitimate leadership quality to the team that's well-liked by everybody. Both agree that Ransom and Richardson deserve reps over Nick Scott, but he provides a great locker room presence that benefits the team. If he can be the defense's version of David Moore then he provides even more value than he does as a starter. Ransom has been one of the best defensive players in camp and Richardson showed that he is a very capable defensive player at safety. End.
×
×
  • Create New...