Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Behind the scenes look at Cam

CatMan72

By CatMan72,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CatMan72 Enthusiast

CatMan72

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yea the Cam's character & the one where he mentors kids are good stuff like this the media doesn't show only the negative.

It's true, the media labels you as either a good guy or a bad guy and then gathers evidence to support the label they've applied to you...

Unfortunately, most people are too complex to be labeled this way. We've all been angels and devils at one point or another in our lives, god help us if the media did a biography on any one of us and chose only to focus on the negative aspects.

Is Cam a saint? No, but neither am I... so I would by a hypocrite to condemn him as having "bad character" when I (and most of us) have done things equally as bad or worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRealDeal Newbie

TheRealDeal

Posted
Posted

True, but the media tends to apply labels to people and then that's all you hear about.

I agree, but you have to remember they have an audience to cater to. If they feel that's what their audience wants to see, that's all you will see.

It's best to never base any opinion/view/belief solely on the media

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CatMan72 Enthusiast

CatMan72

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I agree, but you have to remember they have an audience to cater to. If they feel that's what their audience wants to see, that's all you will see.

It's best to never base any opinion/view/belief solely on the media

Yup, totally understand and agree 100%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Should Dave Canalas be on the HOT seat??

      By frankw · Posted

      I think the Bevell hire has more to do with adding actual veteran head coaching experience to the staff than anything else. But I do wholeheartedly agree that the obsession in general with Seattle needs to come to an end. I mean we plucked the one guy there to be our GM who turned out to be our worst GM in franchise history in just a few short years and that's really saying something given our history there. Clearly trying to mimick Seattle in any way has not been productive. As far as Idzik many of us have asked the same question but at this point in time it doesn't really matter anymore because Canales is either going to lead this franchise to a winning record or he will be shown the door.
    • Anybodyhome
      NHL Olympics Thread (Or just Olympics in general)

      By Anybodyhome · Posted

      Why wasn't here even considered? Better record and save % than any of t he 3 goalies on the US squad.
    • strato
      Should Dave Canalas be on the HOT seat??

      By strato · Posted

      That’s why Bevell is a good move. Idzik might not be chopped liver, he is just inexperienced and even less ready to be the play caller than Canales. I still say the playbook is limited which is a hinderance to calling plays, I would imagine.    Anyway Beavis lol… no Bevell, got to consecutive SBs as an OC and won one with 48 points or something. Should have won the second one. And had several more good years there.    They were the team we had to learn how to beat it took us til the third year I think before we could go into Seattle and successfully compete.   That is glass half full thinking, yep, but that is head and shoulders over what we have had here for a while. Certainly now.     In addition.. It was Canales’ boss. He knew more then , I would bet he knows more now. I can’t look at this as anything but a potential positive thing.  Hell he might be the guy that can look at Dave and say what the fug are you doing? And Dave will listen. I think I can hope for that.  Maybe not.      
×
×
  • Create New...