Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What a 9.0 Magnitude earthquake sounds like


blackcatgrowl

Recommended Posts

Welp, playing around with this using Audacity, I slowed it down from x16 speed to x4 speed. It's audible still, but not by much. Then I slowed it all the way down. There is maybe some increase in a really low rumble... but it's really hard to tell apart from background noise.

But keep in mind, that this sound crossed the pacific and then echoed around! And good lord... it goes on and on... never thought it took so long for two tectonic plates to slide around violently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a former submarine sonarman....

It would have been a continuous, very low rumble - elevated background noise. Since it would have been random, it definitely would not have been classified as anything. There isn't any narrowband to analyze, and of course the spread of the bearing of the sound would have immediately been known to have been fairly wide.

Back in the day we heard stuff like this (but not has long) often and classified it as geologics (as opposed to fish noises which were biologics).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a former submarine sonarman....

It would have been a continuous, very low rumble - elevated background noise. Since it would have been random, it definitely would not have been classified as anything. There isn't any narrowband to analyze, and of course the spread of the bearing of the sound would have immediately been known to have been fairly wide.

Back in the day we heard stuff like this (but not has long) often and classified it as geologics (as opposed to fish noises which were biologics).

You were a Jonesy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Malcom Spence is the best player remaining, hope he’s there.
    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
×
×
  • Create New...