Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rebuilding: A 2-year process


MHS831

Recommended Posts

If we need a QB so badly, and all of the QBs are projects, then if we take one, (with the CBA/lockout mess) he will not play until 2012. However, if we build the team in other areas this year, then next season we could trade up if necessary and get the franchise QB. He then gets camps, OTAs, summer workouts, 3 months of studying, training camp and the preseason to prepare himself. Could start in 2012.

The difference? Drafting a QB next year would give us a player whose contract would expire in 2016 (probably). Draft one this year, you get three years before the contract becomes an issue--not four. Think of this as year 1 of a 2 year process.

Having a developmental, first pick Qb on the bench would only heighten tension next year. When we lost, fans would scream for him, even if he is not ready. Not drafting a QB would prevent Clausen II from happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So then we draft one next year, but we sit him for the season because that's the correct way to do it, right?

So 3 seasons from now, we just start to find out if we've addressed the QB issue.

This honestly seems like a "omg wait for LUCK" post.

I'm sure Rivera is fine tanking 3 years of his 4 year contract in his first head coaching gig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So then we draft one next year, but we sit him for the season because that's the correct way to do it, right?

So 3 seasons from now, we just start to find out if we've addressed the QB issue.

This honestly seems like a "omg wait for LUCK" post.

Not what I said. Your powers of inference are astounding. Why buy a 2011 car and not drive it until 2012?

Why draft a QB you cannot develop?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not QB drafted in the top 5 should be sitting at any point. Not in this day and age

THere will be 3, maybe 4 QBs next year more prepared to start than any QB this season. But the reason I think it is a waste has everything to do with the lockout. Sloth skimmed over that important detail to hit his own agenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My idea is this. You take best pick available, either Green/Peterson (I wouldn't take DT No.1 cause this draft seems pretty stacked at DT), because there is not a QB in this class that (IMO) is a franchise guy. So, take a sure thing, sign a vet (ik there are few, and no free agency until the CBA is resolved), and take your franchise QB in next years draft.

Thus, your almost guranteed a sure fire starter from this draft and a franchise QB in next year's draft instead of a possible bust at QB this draft and drafting another QB next year.

Either way, the panthers will be still drafting a franchise QB one year and a solid starter the next year regardless, because a rookie qb this year is not making this team good enough to get out of the top ten for next year.

So why not draft BPA this year and QB next, and presumably get two sure things rather than taking a huge risk on over inflated QB prospects this year? idk, maybe I'm just pre-draft over analyzed and fried.

Kinda what I was thinking in another thread. Remember I posted that last night..and I was hammered drunk..Spring Break '11 is awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andrew Luck will save us

OK, whatever. Simplify and distort the meaning if it makes it easier for you to understand. You got me. Even though it is a smart thing to do regardless of who is on the table now and who is on the table for next year, this has to be black and white for some of you. Jees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not QB drafted in the top 5 should be sitting at any point. Not in this day and age

There's not a single QB in this year's draft pool that I'd be comfortable starting right away.

The guy who's the closest mentally would be Ryan Mallett, but he's so foot-slow I'd be worried he might not handle the speed of the pro game well (and that's not even broaching the character issues).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THere will be 3, maybe 4 QBs next year more prepared to start than any QB this season. But the reason I think it is a waste has everything to do with the lockout. Sloth skimmed over that important detail to hit his own agenda.

That has been my sentiment the whole time. But I guess as it gets closer and the more things you hear, opinions kinda change. If our FO thinks one of these guys is The Guy, regardless of what we as fans think, then they should choose him. Hopefully, we wont be pressured into taking a QB because we feel we need one that bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not what I said. Your powers of inference are astounding. Why buy a 2011 car and not drive it until 2012?

Why draft a QB you cannot develop?

My powers of inference are pretty kick-ass.

You're inferring that we'd be drafting high.

You're inferring that we'd be better off biting the bullet and gunning for a franchise guy next year.

Your post was a dolled up "I WANT LUUUUUCK".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People love to make bold ass predictions how are you so sure that Barkley, Luck will pan out early on verses Cam, Gabbert, or Mallet? that's your opinion they'll be more prepared.

The Golden Calf of Bristol and Clausen should have showed you that no one knows fans, scouts nor the media who will be productive at the Pro level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's not a single QB in this year's draft pool that I'd be comfortable starting right away.

The guy who's the closest mentally would be Ryan Mallett, but he's so foot-slow I'd be worried he might not handle the speed of the pro game well (and that's not even broaching the character issues).

I agree, although for some weird reason I'm thinking one of those guys might could do something. Damn pressure!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...