Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Newton only similar to one successful QB in last 5 years..


TheRealDeal

Recommended Posts

How do you feel not knowing the difference between a shotgun formation with multiple receivers and the spread option?

Auburn's offense is actually a modified "I" formation that is run out of the shotgun. It has 2 backs and either a tight end or a wide receiver. It isn't a "spread" which is what Gabbert ran with mostly 4 and 5 WR sets.

There are a lot of components that are actually more transferable to the NFL than some traditional spread formations, especially post snap, because it is still based on the principles of run heavy and play action and traditional progressions (although there was some one read and run plays by design especially early in the season).

What he doesn't have right now is knowledge of the language he is going to have to speak and doesn't have a lot of experience with pre-snap reads. But believe it or not almost all QBs have to relearn this when they come out of college even if they come from a pro style offense. Even Clausen who supposedly ran the same offense at ND had problems relaying the plays to teammates last season. Verbiage changes from team to team.

I referred to a story in a previous post (maybe in this thread) about Brad Johnson in Tampa Bay. He never could figure out Gruden's language. And he was a seasoned NFL QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not only the verbiage but the concepts and route combinations he will be seeing.

He really struggled talking about the design and concept of the plays he's run countless times. It'll be tough for him to go from such basic concepts that he could barely explain to complex NFL schemes where he is required to be on the same page as his receivers who are also making reads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wouldn't trade Svech for the best FA on the market, Marner included. Matter of fact, someone would be giving up a top line scorer and a couple draft picks for Svech.  Look at it this way, if Svech was a UFA in a couple days, what does his contract look like? That'll tell you everything you need to know. 
    • I know it a real homer take but Im not sure Id slam dunk take that list over Smitty.  Smith just played a different way, he had an ability to just take over a game as a matter of will.  The catch against the giants where he caught it and took a helmet that broke his arm mid air, the games against DeAngelo Hall, 05 Bears playoffs, Ice Up Son, the revenge game against us. Those other WRs may have better stat books but love him or hate him, good guy or bad, Smith just played a different game and when he did look out.
    • Absolutely would have to be anther young scorer with either ELC time or a long term contract...    Could see maybe Kyrou or Robertson.... But I really just dont see him being traded you dont trade your leading post season scorer on a long term deal when he isn't even in his prime yet..   not to mention unless you get more than one of those guys at best it would be lateral with unknown team chemistry.
×
×
  • Create New...