Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Something I found that you might find interesting (Re: Otah)


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/NFP-Sunday-Blitz-3332.html

*Cornerback Prince Amukamara fell to the Giants at the 19th pick, but he probably should have been a top 10 pick based on talent. What was behind Amukamara’s fall? In many draft rooms, the scouts liked Amukamara more than the coaches. The DB coaches and defensive coordinators got together and decided they weren’t as high on Amukamara as many of their scouting counterparts. The coaches pointed to Amukamara’s short arms (30 1/2 inches, 71 ½ inch wingspan) and small hands (8 ½ inches). And there may have been more to the story. A lot of NFL people are skeptical about Nigerian players like Amukarma [sic]. “And it’s not just white men,” one executive said. “It’s whites and blacks.” It’s still a subtle form of racism. The word on Nigerians: they are soft, not tough enough and too educated. It would be a pity if that’s what cost Amukamara.

This is sort of a weird criticism that I'd never heard of before but could Otah's injury history have contributed somewhat to Prince's fall?

If Otah is hearing this how could he not get pissed and want to prove them wrong?

On a less serious note, what about Clausen? Could his small hands have also contributed to a bias against small hands for DBs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Otah's lived in America since age seven. Kind of tough to put too much stock into the idea that his heritage hurts him given that.

As to the idea being discussed here, Christian Okoye didn't exactly seem soft. Heck, Nnamdi Asomugha was a regular on ESPN's "Jacked Up" a long time ago. There are other examples too (BJ Raji, Ovie Mughelli). I have a hard time buying into this notion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Otah's lived in America since age seven. Kind of tough to put too much stock into the idea that his heritage hurts him given that.

As to the idea being discussed here, Christian Okoye didn't exactly seem soft. Heck, Nnamdi Asomugha was a regular on ESPN's "Jacked Up" a long time ago. There are other examples too (BJ Raji, Ovie Mughelli). I have a hard time buying into this notion.

I know, there's also Osi Umenyiora.

I don't understand where it's coming from either, because the only example I can come up with of a Nigerian player regarded as soft is Otah (this goes back to before he was even drafted) and I'm only aware of him because he plays for the Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do people think Otah is soft? Dude was injured. Injuries happen. He's a beast!

He is a beast at run blocking that's for sure. What was weird was he didn't play an entire season after microscopic knee surgery. But maybe the coaches thought it was pointless putting him in half way into the season when we sucked so bad and they didn't want to risk more injury when he wasn't fully recovered?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone reported that he and Gross had "heated" discussion s about his not playing through pain (per a radio appearance by Gross).

Oh, wasn't aware of that.

I thought he had a torn ACL or something and that's why he missed the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not saying it is true but a lot of blacks do think that. just from my experience the nigerians i know are kinda soft and well educated. some look down on african americans even if they were born in the states, and feel like they are entitled to certain things.

im not saying all are soft but a good number are. fair to assume all are tho is wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Otah was the only o-line starter not at the kickball tournament. So he's either still injured (God help us) or Gross doesn't care for him.

some one reported on here that he was Arizona working out. what worries me about Otah is who hangs around but thats a different convo.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...