Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Women who like the extra slim/slender body type...


Jase

Recommended Posts

uhhhh.....doesn't that describe you?

most of the time... last year I put on a good amount of muscle, thinking that I looked better, and now that I've gotten skinnier again, all I hear is that I look better skinny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when you put on weight(muscle or fat) it gets packed on around your root too making what is seen smaller. its all still there though. it just can't go inside a girl cuz its stuck inside you.

so women that like very slim guys are size queens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when you put on weight(muscle or fat) it gets packed on around your root too making what is seen smaller. its all still there though. it just can't go inside a girl cuz its stuck inside you.

so women that like very slim guys are size queens.

Interesting theory... however the only women who would take notice of this are my wife and my two mistresses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

most of the time... last year I put on a good amount of muscle, thinking that I looked better, and now that I've gotten skinnier again, all I hear is that I look better skinny.

Maybe thats just for your body type. There are definitely guys who look better skinny.

I don't go for a certain body type....I like em all. My ex bf was a tall, skinny dude but he still had muscle on him. Something about the tall skinny thing that I find extremely sexay.

I also like the fuller, more muscular, broad chest...but hey who doesn't.

The only thing I seem to be uniform with is the height thing. Just never been intrigued by the short guys, but then again, "tall" for me is probably not "tall" for most people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
    • The Giants, Cardinals  and Dolphins should have moved on, but they didn't and ended up cutting their QB early into a monster second contract and had to eat a TON of dead cap money.
×
×
  • Create New...