Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone get tested??


chef17

Recommended Posts

The last time I was tested was prior to getting married, 13 or so years ago.

Nope no need... If you don't sleep with dirty whores then you don't need to get tested. Chooseyour next piece of ass more wisely! That way you're not scared into having to get tested...

That's a lame excuse. Dirty whores aren't the only people who get teh jaids. What about all the rusty needle druggies and the saltman?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not today, but I request a check whenever I have my blood sugar level checked. (4 times a year.)

Just to be on the safe side.

A buddy of mine had an idea about 10 years ago. To sell wallet sized cards that said you were tested (had a date) and found to be free of HIV & Herpe virus. and signed by a doctor. It would carry the World Health Org. logo, or Red Cross, or some other symbol. Or course he would operate out of a PO box.

He said all that he would need was a good injet printer and a laminator. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last time I was tested was prior to getting married, 13 or so years ago.

That's a lame excuse. Dirty whores aren't the only people who get teh jaids. What about all the rusty needle druggies and the saltman?

This is all true, with the exception of Salty... I know he's clean ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...