Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top 51 FA's according to PFF


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

Here's a link to an article on Pro Football Focus listing the top 51 free agents as they see it:

http://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2011/07/11/top-51-free-agents/

Charles Johnson is # 2

DeAngelo Williams is # 13

James Anderson is # 29

They list Steve Smith at # 42? (he's not a FA last time I checked unless they are talking about the other Steve Smith, but it sounds like they are describing our SS?)

Personally, I think # 13 is too low for DeAngelo they have him rated lower than Ahmad Bradshaw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually think bringing SS from NY would be a good idea. Or Braylon.

I just want another WR that has seen some games.

edit: Or Lance Moore. If we intent on keeping our SS as the number 1, which we should, Moore would be an excellent slot receiver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually think bringing SS from NY would be a good idea. Or Braylon.

I just want another WR that has seen some games.

edit: Or Lance Moore. If we intent on keeping our SS as the number 1, which we should, Moore would be an excellent slot receiver.

Braylon and/or Floyd should suffice. Smitty in the slot all day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...