Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top 51 FA's according to PFF


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

Here's a link to an article on Pro Football Focus listing the top 51 free agents as they see it:

http://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2011/07/11/top-51-free-agents/

Charles Johnson is # 2

DeAngelo Williams is # 13

James Anderson is # 29

They list Steve Smith at # 42? (he's not a FA last time I checked unless they are talking about the other Steve Smith, but it sounds like they are describing our SS?)

Personally, I think # 13 is too low for DeAngelo they have him rated lower than Ahmad Bradshaw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually think bringing SS from NY would be a good idea. Or Braylon.

I just want another WR that has seen some games.

edit: Or Lance Moore. If we intent on keeping our SS as the number 1, which we should, Moore would be an excellent slot receiver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually think bringing SS from NY would be a good idea. Or Braylon.

I just want another WR that has seen some games.

edit: Or Lance Moore. If we intent on keeping our SS as the number 1, which we should, Moore would be an excellent slot receiver.

Braylon and/or Floyd should suffice. Smitty in the slot all day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Doubling tripling and quadrupling down on this subject in defense of the pick is reminiscent of a certain mindset that has overtaken the political world. This conversation will become less contentious and dragged out to the point of becoming a dead beaten horse if rational minds can simply agree that we made a mistake missed on a potential franchise center and we will learn from it. All this coping is unnecessary.
    • Here in lies the rub that the supporting posters continue to ignore. He wasn’t a 2nd round pick in the 2025 class, especially with an ACL tear. It was a dumb pick for any GM who looks ahead to determine values. C and CB were much better values than an injured RB in 2024. If a RB isn’t even playing much in 2024, you have to compare him to 2025. We’re beating a dead horse but only because the defense of the pick is almost comical at this point. We’ve made a ton of poo picks and moves/non trades while Morgan was GM and the assistant GM. It happens, we don’t have to jump through hoops to act like we just had some really bad luck. The 2025 draft class is unknown so far but damn it felt way better afterwards for the first time in a long time. Embrace the potential and stop stamping guaranteed on the box of poo of the 2018-2024 drafts. We are were we aware because of them and 2025 has to hit so we can get past the 7 win max in 7 year hurdle. Also, “flashed his talent” isn’t 9 carries for 22 yards. His one reception for 18 yards isn’t a flash with 11 other touches for 27 yards. He hasn’t proven anything. We have no idea if he’ll contribute in 2026.
    • Oh for those tired of the Mannings I have bad news, Peytons son Marshal already has college teams after him and he isn't even in HS until this fall...   I'd wager we have two Mannings in the NFL in 2030
×
×
  • Create New...