Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Folks, we have to discuss this. (we really do)


Guest Spot On Dtan

Recommended Posts

Not really sure why you are allowed to say that a new scheme will benefit your defense (13th-which you claim to be "good"), but I am not allowed to say that a new, good FA will benefit mine (10th- which you claim to be terrible). Pretty hypocrital if you ask me.

1. When did I claim 13 was good?

2. When did I claim 10 was terrible?

read my post...I said both were above average. I feel like I am typing to a 10 year old hooked on phonics student.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really sure why you are allowed to say that a new scheme will benefit your defense (13th-which you claim to be "good"), but I am not allowed to say that a new, good FA will benefit mine (10th- which you claim to be terrible). Pretty hypocrital if you ask me.

because adding Ray Edwards doesn't stop Aaron Rodgers from raping your 22nd ranked pass defense...?

Brent Grimes will be best served in Carolina.. send him on over.. we'll give you a pick, it's not going to make up for the JJ debacle , but it's a start...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Spot On Dtan

Atlanta should trade Grimes over to us to make up a draft pick.. they won't be needing him much longer anyhow considering they have about 2 years left of being in the spotlight..

You could have had him for a first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Spot On Dtan

1. When did I claim 13 was good?

2. When did I claim 10 was terrible?

read my post...I said both were above average. I feel like I am typing to a 10 year old hooked on phonics student.

Wasn't talking to you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Spot On Dtan

because adding Ray Edwards doesn't stop Aaron Rodgers from raping your 22nd ranked pass defense...?

Brent Grimes will be best served in Carolina.. send him on over.. we'll give you a pick, it's not going to make up for the JJ debacle , but it's a start...

Effective pass rush doesn't help the secondary?

Get on my level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Spot On Dtan

Your logic here proves our point about Deangelo Williams. Williams is 28...but has never been a true feature back. He has always split carries with another back. Williams is never abused in a game. He has many good years left in him. There is no point in being critical about our GM, who rewarded a top tier RB (who's career average is well over 4.0 ypc) that has been underpaid his entire career. Good players with high morale play much better than one with low morale.

You're comparing apples to oranges here.

I'm making the case that Turner has a few (1 or 2) years left because of his time spent backing up LT.

You're making the case that DWill deserves a 5 year, 43 million dollar contract because he has split time the last couple of years.

Not seeing it.

Cause it just isn't there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Spot On Dtan

I read this entire thread.

What the hell is wrong with me?

You are an objective individual. That's what that says.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...