Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Newton starter vs Bengals, Week 1 starter TBD


Sword

Recommended Posts

The reality is this is a young team with holes that is going nowhere this year.

Cam is the future (That's what a #1 overall pick is) and Good, Bad or Ugly we'll ride this ship for the forseeable future. This years experience will pay dividends next and beyond.

No one should be surprised by this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

one thing I will say - I am excited to watch this game. We'll finally see what Cam can do with a full gameplan and a week of practice with the 1s. I really hope he comes out and lights it up, because I'd love nothing more than to be positive he is the best QB on the roster... I know many of you already are but I'm just not sold yet at this point.

The reality is this is a young team with holes that is going nowhere this year.

Cam is the future (That's what a #1 overall pick is) and Good, Bad or Ugly we'll ride this ship for the forseeable future. This years experience will pay dividends next and beyond.

No one should be surprised by this.

my problem is that was the same rationale used for starting Jimmy after moore struggled and other holes were exposed and my fear is that we'll throw another QB in too early. But I am just a worrier at heart :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reality is this is a young team with holes that is going nowhere this year.

Cam is the future (That's what a #1 overall pick is) and Good, Bad or Ugly we'll ride this ship for the forseeable future. This years experience will pay dividends next and beyond.

No one should be surprised by this.

As much as a losing season seems like a reality this year you never really know until the season actually gets going..Win lose or draw I can only hope we don't look like a team that doesn't belong out there like last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my problem is that was the same rationale used for starting Jimmy after moore struggled and other holes were exposed and my fear is that we'll throw another QB in too early. But I am just a worrier at heart :p

It's up to our offensive line, our tandem at RB and play calling to make sure Cam succeeds.

Edit: Oh and Cam too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reality is this is a young team with holes that is going nowhere this year.

Cam is the future (That's what a #1 overall pick is) and Good, Bad or Ugly we'll ride this ship for the forseeable future. This years experience will pay dividends next and beyond.

No one should be surprised by this.

that's the way i see it but if newton just tanks i'm thinking they go with anderson instead of clausen until cam is ready

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's up to our offensive line, our tandem at RB and play calling to make sure Cam succeeds.

Edit: Oh and Cam too.

it's also going to be up to our WRs.

It's basically going to come down to what it came down to last year.. can our line open holes and can it hold together long enough for our WRs to get open?

My hope is Cam's increased mobility will help a bit with the later. But a lot of it will depend on how fast Cam can learn on the job.

that's the way i see it but if newton just tanks i'm thinking they go with anderson instead of clausen until cam is ready

anderson has been flat out awful by all accounts... I think that is honestly why he isn't in the conversation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's also going to be up to our WRs.

It's basically going to come down to what it came down to last year.. can our line open holes and can it hold together long enough for our WRs to get open?

My hope is Cam's increased mobility will help a bit with the later. But a lot of it will depend on how fast Cam can learn on the job.

anderson has been flat out awful by all accounts... I think that is honestly why he isn't in the conversation.

Hopefully with Smitty and Olsen Cam will have 2 reliable safety nets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there is no such thing as playing a qb to early, whether you sit a game or 4 years you have to at somepoint produce when live bullets are flying. every qb is going to struggle, the ones that succeed have a good support arrangement, are mentally tough & have the drive to get better

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully with Smitty and Olsen Cam will have 2 reliable safety nets.

Yeah, I think he and Olsen are already developing a decent bond. Slightly better ball placement and he'll have Olsen streaking for TDs I think. I like what I've seen with him connecting with our TEs, and with Smitty out, hard to judge him on WRs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think RR made the correct decision. At the same time, it won't matter who is playing QB if we don't protect a bit better, and put some wide outs on the field that can get open. If Smitty goes down, we have nothing. Seems to me we have to go shopping for a 2nd WR.

As to Cam, I am very confident Chud can put together a good game plan to take advantage of what he does well. I believe it will look significantly better than what we have seen so far. We may not see it this week, but should week 1 against Arizona.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, if Moore really wants out, then it would behoove the Bears to make it happen sooner than later. X is a lot younger and cheaper, and may be a better fit for Johnson's musings than a disgruntled, unnecessary, overpaid vet. If they can dump his salary and maybe get a fourth or so in return, it may be worth it to them. As for development, I'm not concerned. You're talking about a seeming bust, a day three guy and a UDFA. They are developing relative to their ceilings. I doubt any of them will ever command the coverage, money, or the respect that Moore has acquired. He's a tier above them. Yes, even X. 
    • IMO, if Ceedee plays against us, the game probably goes the other way. Same with Tyreek Hill and the Dolphins. Our team just isn't designed to beat teams with two high level receivers like that. But when you look at the league, how many teams really have two guys of that caliber?  There's nothing wrong with defensive adjustments, but sometimes I think a lot of fans want Evero to call a different play like a game on madden, and defensive football just isn't like that. That said, I thought we did a much better job this season against the Cowboys of flipping Jaycee and at least making them work for it, opposed to last season when they literally just lined CeeDee up on the other side of the field every single snap.  For us to just straight up switch to consistent man coverage, or a different zone, or whatever, we likely would consistently need different personnel on the field. Doing it a few times a game is a gamble and can work, but if we consistently run man coverage against the Cowboys, eventually a RB is going to beat a linebacker, or something of that nature with our personnel. Part of the reason Evero likes this scheme is that, while we have our defaults and presets, what we do is very multiple, and you can do a lot of different things pre and post snap. We are a challenging defense to read. But as you said, if guys are getting beat, it doesn't really matter what you call. 
×
×
  • Create New...