Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rank the following QB performances over 3 weeks from best to worst


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

but the problem is you probably know i saw the same stats before i posted it, therefore I do not care. I knew you were going to make this point anyway.

the point is this completion percentage thing that people keep emphasizing is quite common when it comes to rookie QBs, they have games like this. plus there have been no OTAs. For the most part they don't finish in the 40s as far as completion percentage goes but they do look bad in some of their first performances. This is based in fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ryan has done no such thing...nor has Flacco. Vick has taken a team to the NFCCG and Eli has a ring, yet you have Ryan and Flacco, neither of whom have done anything as better?

Laughable at best and I hate both Vick and Eli.

Im comparing Quarterbacks not teams. Ryan and Flacco have put up 3 consecutive solid seasons each. Ring or not based on how each quarterback has performed, Id take Flacco or Ryan over Vick or Eli Any day of the week and twice on Sunday.

On another note if Vick follows up his last season with something respectable his status would change in my eyes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember when we did this last year?

Like Aikman had a terrible rookie year but then became a hall of famer and that's why Clausen doesn't suck?

Big difference between preseason and regular season kiddo.

If Newton continues to struggle at the end of the season, have at it. But saying he sucks because of his preseason play? That's fan dumbassery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why don't we just say they can shove the late round draft picks up their ass? If they want a player they will be starting at WR in Week 1, I want a MLB in return that we can start Week 1. Starter for a Starter Not Starter for a draft pick we'll be debating whether or not they should make the final 53 man roster in 2026.
    • Why?   No. This isn't a situation of a player we want to trade because we have no use for them.  He's our starting slot WR, our leader of the young WR room, Bryce's safety option the last 2 years who he has good chemistry with. If the Vikings didn't run into WR trouble, we'd never have been even considering trading him, so why in the world should we give him up for fair market value in a vacuum for Thielen and disregard what losing him off our roster will do for us this year? A 5th round pick in 2026 is a negligible draft pick, especially with this season being so make or break for Bryce and Canales.
    • The Vikings acquiring all these late round picks has me feeling like we're about to see another CMC situation play out here. Trade a player we really like for the equivalent of what we want for them on the draft pick chart, but because of a bunch of late round picks instead of the one pick value we actually want. Which will do the same thing in the end, nothing, because 6th and 7th round picks rarely work out to begin with, or we're just going to use them to move up 10 picks in the 3rd or 4th round to take another DJ Johnson
×
×
  • Create New...