Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN.com, landing page


KSpan

Recommended Posts

From the article:

Afterward, Newton, wearing dress socks, a T-shirt and shorts, sat in a folding chair in front of his locker and stared straight ahead. He hadn't lost a game since Oct. 31, 2009, when his Blinn College team lost to Navarro College. Since then, nothing but W's -- until Sunday.

He sat in that chair, elbows on knees, as the rest of the Panthers dressed and made their way to the team's charter bus. Told that Newton seemed to be taking the loss hard, tight end Greg Olsen said, "I don't know why. He was a big reason why we had a chance.''

Minutes later, Olsen walked over to Newton and offered some encouraging words. Not that it mattered much. Newton isn't used to being on the wrong end of the scoreboard.

...

"He was everything that everybody didn't expect him to be,'' said Carolina's veteran wide receiver Steve Smith, who caught eight of Newton's passes for 178 yards and two touchdowns.I'll admit it: I didn't expect him to throw for more than 400 yards. Or 300 yards. Or maybe 200 yards. And I guarantee you the Cardinals didn't, either.

At least, most of them didn't.

"I played against Newton last year,'' said Cardinals rookie cornerback Patrick Peterson, whose 89-yard TD punt return midway through the fourth quarter turned out to be the game-winner. "I told you guys from the beginning that he is a great athlete and is definitely going to be one of the greats in this league.''

Newton threw for more than three times as many yards (136) as he did against Mississippi State last September. He threw for 157 more yards than he did during Auburn's BCS Championship win against Oregon in this same stadium nine months ago.

To put a nice stats ribbon on the day, think of those 422 yards this way: Tom Brady, Terry Bradshaw, Fran Tarkenton, Bart Starr -- some of the absolute greats of the game -- have never thrown for as many yards as Newton did Sunday.

He made it look spectacularly simple, which, of course, it isn't. The NFL is littered with rookie debuts in which quarterbacks needed Depends.

...

"I would have done the same thing [Cardinals defensive coordinator Ray Horton] did, I'll tell you that right now,'' Panthers head coach Ron Rivera said.

"They brought the house the whole time,'' Panthers linebacker Thomas Davis said. "He managed it well. Those are things for veteran quarterbacks to overcome.''

Newton took two shots that resulted in roughing-the-passer penalties. Arizona defensive tackle Darnell Dockett took a little extra time removing himself from Newton after a tackle. Newton tried to slap him away.

"He's had the world on his shoulders for a year now and I think he's getting used to it,'' Carolina offensive tackle Jordan Gross said. "This is a tough game. He got hit a lot. Crowd noise, but he had incredible composure out there against all odds. He was as advertised.''

...

On the Panthers' final drive, Newton completed 60 yards' worth of passes and had Carolina on the Cardinals' 11 with 1 minute, 30 seconds remaining to play. A touchdown would have tied the game.

Instead, he threw three consecutive incompletions and his fourth pass, an underneath route to running back Mike Goodson, was a yard short of a first down.

"A lot of bad throws on my part at the end,'' Newton said.

He was hard on himself. Too hard.

"Cam is very disappointed,'' Smith said. "I'm encouraged by that.''

And so he was also encouraged by Newton's play and potential, right? Smith scoffed at the suggestion.

"So 'encouraged' is selling him short,'' Smith said. "And I'm not going to sell him short.''

Nobody is going to do that. Not after Sunday's performance.

Newton didn't do what he wanted, which was make possible a Panthers' comeback. But he did something almost as important.

He made believers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly, there are almost 300 comments, many coming from those who are looking for any reason to diminish Cam's accomplishment. Anyway, I am more disappointed that the Panthers lose than I was the Giants and that's because I saw a QB and his offense team doing everything he could to help his team and a defense and secondary team ruining his coming out party.

It's clear in the end that Cam was rushing the game. It took him less time to get to the redzone than it did for him to get the elusive touchdown. I don't know who was making the decisions but that is where u saw him forcing the ball and making a few bad throws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...