Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Glad Cam went against an elite defense early on.........and my take


jtnc

Recommended Posts

This means he will not be fazed by Saints and Falcons defense, he'll be able to go back on today's tape and make less mistakes. A loss is bad, but many people didn't even think this game would be close.

Positives:

My God Johnson is worth every penny, talk about getting pressure from everywhere

Mcclain and Fua did an excellent job getting push

Davis is back!!! #thisisall

Newton never gives up, he wanted a win but sadly we were unable to deliver.

Lafell is really stepping up and is making a statement for the No.2 receiver spot.

Gamble is also back, we are now seeing the Gamble we saw 3 years ago

Munnerlyn may be short, but man does he fight.

Very good pass protection by the offensive line with Otah missing.

Negatives:

No running game. Wasn't worried the first game, but I'm getting very worried hopefully Chud can adjust

Pugh showed a lot of promise during the preseason, but now he is getting beat a lot and usually he's not getting beat for 10 yard plays, more like 30 yard plays that can shift momentum.

Cam has to be patient and throw it away, sometimes running is not the best option

Smith's mind was in another place.

Princess Naane needs to be demoted, I'd rather Armanti than him.

Let's rebound and whop the LA/Jacksonville Jaguars ass! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...