Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should I transition?


cdandi1

Recommended Posts

I need some advice from the gaming gods.

I have a ps3 with two controllers and 12 games. Everything is fully functional, looks great, yada yada. I have had Playstations since the original PS, so I am very familiar with the systems, controllers, etc. I have a few issues with Playstation Network's reliability and security..and a lack of personal friends (they all have 360's).

So, I am thinking about trading in my ps3 console (40g), two controllers and 12 games for store credit at a local game stop. Game stop currently has a bunch of promotions right now regarding ps3 console and game trade ins.

In conclusion..would I be able to make the transition without spending any money (aka using store credit for transitioning)? Is it worth it? And any other advice to things I might have (and probably) over looked would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks for any advice in advance!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd sell that stuff first before giving it away to game stop. Because that's literally what you're doing when you do business with Game stop. They will low ball you man.

I wanted to get the newer version of the 360, and they wanted to give me $70 bucks for my old console, an elite console, which they would turn around and sell for triple the price.

My two cents, sell that stuff on Craigslist. You'll get more money out of it that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would buy a cheap xbox off ebay. You can even get a broken one and repair it yourself, it is pretty easy.

To get the console itself and a controller, you might be able to spend around 60 bucks if you do it right.

Otherwise I would try craigslist first, as you could probably get more money out of your system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the only reason I said gamestop was because they are running a bunch of trade in promotions..but I am aware of the bullShi* the gaming stores try to pull.

Everyone I've talked to all concentrate on exclusives for each system..but I don't play games for the exclusives..I'm pretty much a NCAA football guy and coD or Battlefield 3(when its out)...and I pretty much play online...so it seems obvious to switch.

I've thought about craigs list...but I know alot of fug9rs who get booted from live for modifications of thier consoles and then sell them..at least I'm guaranteed not for that to happen if I buy it used through a gamestop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... you're in a huge University.... go to a bulletin board, stick a paper with your information and asking price on a wall.

Wait and see your stuff get sold.

Ha, well I graduated this year..so I am no longer there. But, I live in Louisville, KY now (grad student UofL), so I may do the same on campus here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd try ebay too.

I guess I shouldn't say to make sure you wipe the HDD before you sell it.

You may get more if you sell everything separately. People will low ball on their offers if you try to sell it all at once. I tried to sell my PS3 with 4 games and 6 blu-rays along with 2 controllers and an HDMI cable back when the PS3 was $600 by itself. I was selling everything for $700. No takers. I sold everything individually and got around $1000.

edit: and the competition in shooters on Xbox Live vs. PSN is much fiercer. Don't get frustrated and quit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, GameStop should be a last resort only. They prey on the easy and uninformed. First I'd go with Craigslist, eBay, local "Iwanna", etc. before I'd ever consider selling anything to GameStop...

Although, I did sell a Mario Kart DS game to GameCrazy for like $40 when it was only selling for about half of that on eBay. Got me more than half trade in for BFBC2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We are in a unique situation here. Just my opinion. Three things: Moton’s playing health has been gradually declining as he is aging, while his contract is a drag on the payroll.  Something will give with him sooner than later but I think 2026 could be it.  So.. need a right tackle by 2027. At the latest.    Icky’s individual situation is unique as well. They would have had an extension done by now if not for the injury. We only have him for this year. With no assurance he will ever be the same player.  It would be reckless just to assume. Now we have Walker for one year. And that is a major relief. Maybe he is the answer, but the team that knows him best let him go and it was cheap for us to sign him. So how much did they value him?    We look to be needing two tackles by 2027.  And have poo for depth this year as well. So anyway we could draft a guy for 2027 RT and groom him this year, and see how Icky does, and act as needed in 2027. Spread out filling the two holes over 2 years.    Then I remember, hey if Bryce doesn’t get a Lot more consistent do they extend him? Hoping not, if he isn’t really good.    So then we are looking at the 2027 draft which people say is gonna be loaded with QBs. If we need a LT and a QB what is the pick gonna get spent on?   Taking into account the recovery success rates cited here on the Icky surgery, you might want to plan for him to not be the same player. rather than assume he will be and get caught with your pants down.  It is a tough situation.    And factor in that it is critically important to protect this QB, always, but especially this year where it is said to be make or break. And how you might feel about that.    All of it points to a real possibility that these things converge in the negative, like Bruce sucks and Icky is not the same. In that case if you want to be assured of getting LT secured, the only place you can do that through the could be very well be 2026 1st round.     For me, I would like to err on the side of caution.  Cover for these outcomes. It wouldn’t be fun. Added benefit is if we do have a tackle go down this year we will have a guy there. Because I don’t know what we have now.  
    • I agree. In a perfect world I wouldn’t want to draft another WR, but in this draft it’s fine based on the value of who will be there at #19.  All of the top tier guys worth pick #19 at other positions of need will be long gone. Only exception is Dillon Thieneman, but he’s almost a shoe in for the Vikings as the Harrison Smith replacement. Some posters on here want to draft an OT just to check a box without realizing the concerns and risk that comes along with said player. Sounds like XL to me… desperately drafting need… KC is a pretty safe player.  Produced all 3 years in college and last year in the SEC vs a lot of top corners in this years draft. He single handily dropped the South Carolina CB Brandon Cisse’s draft stock with how bad he abused him.   Sometimes it’s best to try and hit a double instead of going for the home run. This draft screams “go for the double”. Esp in the first. 
    • Look at what the Bears have done with Caleb Williams, drafting playmaking WR's and TE's and making it easier for him to operate the offense. Conception is perfect for what the offense needs (speed and someone who can make defenders miss) and as today, April 11th, I think he's the pick @19 
×
×
  • Create New...