Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton vs Christian Ponder


Zithers

Recommended Posts

is it just me or does Christian Ponder sound like a ghey porn star name?

He looks like one too. I can't remember a more goofy looking QB in the history of NFL since I've been watching. Fug him. We're going to tear it up in the air against them. We need to come out scoring TD's and not FG's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AP is no better this year than the other two or three times we've faced him, and the rest of the offense is considerably worse. There's definitely the possibility of him having a huge day against us, but we've done reasonably well containing him in the past and like the other guy pointed out McClain and Fua are still better than Nick freaking Hayden. I think he could have a good day, but I think there's a lot of overreaction in this thread. Turner had a good day because the rest of the offense around him was solid, and for whatever reason Forte always has our number. AP won't likely get 300 yards or whatever retarded numbers people are throwing out there, and he won't win the game by himself. The Vikings still only have 1 other offensive weapon (Harvin) and unless Ponder plays very well or the Vikings defense totally shuts down our offense I'd say this will be our 2nd easiest game left on the schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the single game rushing record again?

296 Adrian Peterson Minnesota Vikings November 4, 2007 San Diego Chargers

295 Jamal Lewis Baltimore Ravens September 14, 2003 Cleveland Browns

278 Corey Dillon Cincinnati Bengals October 22, 2000 Denver Broncos

top 3 from Wiki....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...