Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fuging Amazing!


chknwing

Recommended Posts

How can you get 5 of 6 sides? If one piece is wrong on one side then another must also have a wrong piece right?

Good catch, lol :rofl:

Well its has been like 10 years or so since I actually knew what moves to do, lol. Might not have been a full 5 sides but I remember it being pretty close. The moves are all the same up to a point, then they start changing and getting harder to keep up with. Never could get there on my own, but did find a website where you could put in the sticker locations and it would give you the moves in order to complete it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, this is legit. Add to that, the dang thing is built out of legos and powered by an Android phone. Fuggen crazy

looks like more than legos to me. there's something driving the moving parts, and I see a gameboy or something similar at the beginning of it in the lower right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you watch the cell phone screen, it blinks at around 1 second... odd. Cool nonetheless

I was watching this and noticed the pause too.

The image in the first 1.1 seconds is actualy the camera/video image from the phone taking a picture of the orientation of the colors on the sides as it slides the cube into place.

That split second pause is how long it takes the computer to calculate the moves and upload them to the actuation controller.

After the black screen/pause, the image changes to a computer generated 3-d represenation of its processing results. It's not actually showing an image of the moves, its showing you what it thinks its doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Some national praise for Stankonia this fine morning... NHL playoff breakouts: 6 players opening eyes with their postseason performance Stankoven had an absolutely dominant Game 1 against Ottawa. At five-on-five, the team went up 19-5 in shot attempts, 2-0 in scoring, and earned a 93 percent xG rate in his minutes. Stankoven’s seven shot attempts and overall efforts helped contribute to 2.17 of the Canes’ 3.16 expected goals at five-on-five. ... After earning two primary points on the Canes’ goals on Saturday, he saved a goal in Game 2 that almost slipped over the line (and likely would have changed the tone of the game early), and added another of his own. 15 early takes from Round 1 of the Stanley Cup Playoffs 5. Stankoven’s a dawg The Hurricanes have a lot of dawgs — Martinook is one too — but Logan Stankoven deserves the title in his own way. Three goals through two games, not afraid of the moment, and his line with Taylor Hall and Jackson Blake is relentless. They’ve got an expected goal rate around 75 per cent at 5-on-5 so far. ***Bonus Round*** 4. Tkachuk has to settle into the moment Last Ottawa thought is that they’ve got lots of guys going. Tim Stutzle is all over it, Drake Batherson, Ridly Greig, these guys should’ve scored more than they have, but it’s like there’s a forcefield at the net. However, Brady Tkachuk hasn’t been on the ice for a goal for yet, and to me, it’s because he’s just so damn over-eager. He looks like he’s in a fist-fight with the puck out there and it’s blowing up on his stick way too often. He needs the opposite of smelling salts pre-game. He needs a chai tea and a fiction novel in the dressing room. He’s one of the rare guys you’d like to see calm down, rather than rev up.
    • I am already mad about the pick.
    • I definitely want a DT as versatile as McD. (Trade back) I am not into McNeil-Warren because I (for some reason) see him as a run stuffer more than a center fielder.  Not interested in Sadiq because I think a TE in round 1 is a waste of a first rounder, and I lke Iheanachor, but not round 1.  I think it might be WR or OT--
×
×
  • Create New...