Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you rather be high or drunk


Guest Irv

Recommended Posts

food, sex, music, movies, and everything else is better being high i hope in my lifetime it gets legalized. Alcohol on the other hand kills people that is all. id rather be high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

food, sex, music, movies, and everything else is better being high i hope in my lifetime it gets legalized. Alcohol on the other hand kills people that is all. id rather be high.

Never been high in my life so I can't make a fully informed decision either way, but here's how I feel about drunkenness in your categories.

Food: Everything tastes great, can't get enough of it.

Sex: Hit or miss, could be really awesome or a total disaster. Worth the risk.

Music: The worse it is, the more awesome it sounds. I enjoy good music just fine when sober.

Movies: Normally only comedies are fun to watch when drunk. Or action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only the mentally handicap drink

Well they have to be if they choose alcohol over herb.

Reality is if you work for any kind of larger company you will prolly get drug tested before and possibly during employment so herb is off the shelf.

Of course if sweeping parking lots is your life calling NP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reality is if you work for any kind of larger company you will prolly get drug tested before and possibly during employment so herb is off the shelf.

Of course if sweeping parking lots is your life calling NP.

If you're working for a large company you wont be getting high from herb, you'll be using stuff that is going to end your life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
×
×
  • Create New...