Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting Statistic

Dex

By Dex,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Dex Collaborator

Dex

Posted
Posted

Although we are excelling at passing week in and week out the running game has been somewhat lackluster... Or so I thought. It has picked up as of late and I was checking out our statistics. We are currently ranked 7th in rushing and we have three players in the top 50 rushers.

#21 DeAngelo Williams - Attempts - 68 / Yards - 337 / Average - 5.0 / TD's - 1

#27 Jonathan Stewart - Attempts - 59 / Yards - 278 / Average - 4.8 / TD's - 1

#29 Cam Newton - Attempts - 57 / Yards - 266 / Average - 4.7 / TD's - 7 / Swag - Infinite / Passing TD's - 8

So keep in mind there are 32 teams in the NFL and we have 3 out of the 32 top rushers on a team who apparently couldn't run the ball.

I'm liking it.

:jc:

stats

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dex Collaborator

Dex

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Those stats are somewhat surprising. Especially our RB's. Outside of that DeAngelo run vs the Saints, I can't really remember anything spectacular. Cam however.... I mean.... poo, not even worth trying to put it in words.
Yeah, it snuck up on me as well. I just thought I'd check out the stats and was pleasantly surprised. It's not 1 rusher getting 150 yards but three rushers getting 50 yards a game. I'll take it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PanthersATL
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By PanthersATL · Posted

      They said there wasn't clear evidence to warrant the overturn.  How would it have made a difference at that point in the game?   https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-privately-admitted-to-erroneous-reversal-of-catch-by-panthers
    • Khyber53
      WWE pay per view and programming thread

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • CPantherKing
      Going for it instead of leading by two scores in the 4th

      By CPantherKing · Posted

      Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...