Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Penn State...what did Paterno know?


g5jamz

Recommended Posts

One question that has not been addressed.

If McQueary and Calhoun saw the atrocious acts that they outlined in the indictment (and I assume that they did), why did NEITHER go to the police.

McQueary reported it to his superior.....which is exactly what Paterno did.

I am not excusing Paterno's non-action....he SHOULD have done more. But, McQueary seems to be getting a total pass....and he ACTUALLY witnessed the action, and basically did nothing about it.

If I walked in on what he says he saw, I would have damn sure done something about it right then. I would have gone after Sandusky....not just turned and walk away.

You can be certain that I am not giving McQueary a pass. McQueary and Calhoun both should have gone to the authorities the moment they realized nothing had been done by the people they reported the acts to. I think Calhoun, who was visibly upset and shaken by what he saw, didn't do more because he was afraid he was going to get fired, as they were all new or temp employees on the janitorial staff outside of one guy.

That being said, there is not a job on this planet, or any other, that I wouldn't readily risk giving up to report something like that. The allegations are horrific enough in this case, but the instinct of self-preservation by everybody that had witnessed these things personally or had been told about them brings it to a whole other level of sickness in my opinion. My wife knows I'm a selfish asshole, yet always tells me I'm a good man, perhaps it's because if I was McQueary or Calhoun I would have immediately beat the sh*t out of Sandusky, and taken his bloody body to the police station doorstep with the boy at my side. Maybe I'm just old fashioned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No this sick ordeal obviously happened. Everybody keeps saying Paterno should have immediately fired Sandusky but Sandusky was not his employee. Sandusky is clearly a sick pervert but it's hard to say what JP should have or should have not done from the testimony in the indictment. I don't know what university policy was, I don't know if it was followed. I do know there was a cover up but there is no way to tell from the information we have who is responsible.

These kind of stories get people into an emotional tizzy but uncovering the actual truth is much more complicated and nuanced than it seems on the surface. I'm talking about Paterno and the University here not the creep who is clearly guilty.

Paterno found out about the sexual acts ocurring in HIS locker room! maybe he couldnt fire him again, but he could CALL THE POLICE and NOT LET HIM IN HIS LOCKER ROOM!!! Thats all we saying dawg.

Also...You PennState alums do realize that your blind obedience to this kid rape factory is literally making your school look like a ridiculous inbred cult?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A ten year old boy was anally raped in Joe Paterno's team locker room. It was brought to Paterno's attention as sexual activity in some capacity. It took nine years after that for Sandusky to be in handcuffs. Would you agree that to be fact?

Yes that's exactly what happened from what I can see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One question that has not been addressed.

If McQueary and Calhoun saw the atrocious acts that they outlined in the indictment (and I assume that they did), why did NEITHER go to the police.

McQueary reported it to his superior.....which is exactly what Paterno did.

I am not excusing Paterno's non-action....he SHOULD have done more. But, McQueary seems to be getting a total pass....and he ACTUALLY witnessed the action, and basically did nothing about it.

If I walked in on what he says he saw, I would have damn sure done something about it right then. I would have gone after Sandusky....not just turned and walk away.

This is what I'm referring to when I say we don't know exactly how the events transpired and the only true culprit that is easy to identify at this point is the creep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just read the entire indictment and the facts that we do know to be true, as testified by Paterno in front of a Grand Jury, are that he was told by Mike McQueery at a meeting at his house that he had seen something going on that was inappropriate between Sandusky and a boy, estimated to be 10-13 years old. Now you can believe MM, or you can believe JP on the exact verbage of what he saw, but even if you believe the less-graphic version testified by Paterno, it would be cause enough to make sure that an investigation is opened up IMMEDIATELY, and that Sandusky is banned from campus until the investigation is concluded. This is not a witch hunt. JoePa knew something inappropriate had happened between Sandusky and a child, and did the bare minimum to address it and then wiped his hands of the matter. Those are facts as presented in the indictment by a grand jury stemming from testimony of person(s) directly involved with the case.

This is not a juicy internet scandal that people are watching. It is the atrocious acts of a souless monster who enticed underprivileged boys with promises of sporting events and sporting gear, while he was in a DIRECT position to protect them.

What makes it worse, is there were people in a position of power who could have stopped this as early as 1998, but certainly no later than 2002, and they all either turned a blind eye, or did just enough to absolve themselves of criminally illegal wrongdoing.

The janitor, Jim Calhoun, was so distraught over what he had witnessed that several different persons thought he was going to have a heart attack on the spot. This from a man that fought in Korea and saw "guts spilled out" and dismembered bodies. This man is now in a nursing home with dementia. Not saying the incidents are related, but who knows what kind of toll this thing has had on this guys mind for the past nine years.

This isn't just some juicy scandal that people are salivating over. This is the most deplorable allegation of crimes that could ever hit any institution, and what I see as criminal indifference by people in a position to stop it.

I agree with everything in this post. Everything. I'm not defending anybody but I don't have teh answers as to who "opens investigations", who "bans" professors from campus? How do you know JoPa washed his hands and skipped down the field? Who knows what he felt, what he was told and what he thought was being done about it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paterno found out about the sexual acts ocurring in HIS locker room! maybe he couldnt fire him again, but he could CALL THE POLICE and NOT LET HIM IN HIS LOCKER ROOM!!! Thats all we saying dawg.

Also...You PennState alums do realize that your blind obedience to this kid rape factory is literally making your school look like a ridiculous inbred cult?

I hear you man. I'm not a Penn State fan so I don't have a dog in the hunt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I asked about accreditation earlier in the thread. So there are 2 of us that see this as a possibility, since we know that the admins knew and did nothing.

I've worked with SACS (Southern Association of Colleges & Schools) several times & while its on the table, I highly doubt that particular action will be taken. 1. It would wreck the degrees for current students & might go retroactive to 02 (possibly 98). 2. It would create chaos because all profs with tenure would likely leave meaning the accreditation association would have to help find them jobs. Also, non-tenured would have to be helped due to the absolute fuggin plunge in enrollment (not sure if MSACS would help though). Last but not least, the money sunk into buildings & equipment would likely go to waste.

Its more likely that they will force the admin, regents, & trustees to step down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One question that has not been addressed.

If McQueary and Calhoun saw the atrocious acts that they outlined in the indictment (and I assume that they did), why did NEITHER go to the police.

McQueary reported it to his superior.....which is exactly what Paterno did.

I am not excusing Paterno's non-action....he SHOULD have done more. But, McQueary seems to be getting a total pass....and he ACTUALLY witnessed the action, and basically did nothing about it.

If I walked in on what he says he saw, I would have damn sure done something about it right then. I would have gone after Sandusky....not just turned and walk away.

I understand what you're saying, but it needs to be mentioned that people aren't letting McQueary get a pass. He's getting death threats from people who hate that he let Sandusky go and those who think he let Penn State fall into this mess. He's not going to coach this weekend. It's not because PSU didn't know what to do. It's because 1. they needed to check the legality of firing him because of Whistle Blower laws; 2. they want him to cooperate, and firing him immediately lessens the chance he'll be willing to help them going forward.

Also, 95% of the people interested in this story had a least some idea who JoePa was before this story, and probably less than 1% knew who knew McQueary. This will eventually focus itself on McQueary, but right now it's on JoePa because that's a more interesting villain.

McQueary is a piece of poo for many reasons. I make the argument that Paterno is the scumbag here because it's his culture that allowed this to happen at PSU, not McQueary's. Check the timeline. It's chalk full of instances that just scream of cover-up, and don't think for a second Joe wasn't the central figure in every discussion about how they were going to make this go away.

Might want to check your facts.

Nothing personal, and I mean this in the nicest way, but don't know what the fvck you're talking about.

Is your central argument that Sandusky was a professor and not a coach, therefore it wasn't within JoePa's jurisdiction to fire him? Because not only is that dumb and untrue, it's completely meaningless. No one is mad that Sandusky wasn't properly fired. THEY'RE PISSED BECAUSE HE WAS A KNOWN PEDERAST PARADING AROUND CAMPUS FOR 14 YEARS and no one told the police.

So pardon me, but don't concern yourself with my understanding of the facts when you clearly can't speak intelligently about the subject.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The referee assigned to this game is Shawn Smith. This is a critical data point for betting purposes because his crew has one of the most distinct, long-term statistical biases in the NFL. "Road Team" Bias: Historically, Shawn Smith is known as the "Road Team Referee." In a league where home teams usually win ~55% of the time, home teams in Smith's games have historically won at a rate far below league average (often hovering around 40-42%). Against The Spread (ATS): The trend is even starker here. Home teams have covered the spread at a rate of roughly 37-40% in his career. The Mechanism: Analysis shows his crew tends to call a higher rate of False Start and Unnecessary Roughness penalties on the Home Team. This negates the traditional home-field advantage (crowd noise causing false starts for the visitors). Impact on This Game: This specific assignment heavily favors the Buccaneers (Road Team). If you believe the referee influences the game, Smith's presence suggests the Panthers will struggle to get "home cooking" calls and may face untimely procedural flags that stall drives. The Panthers have only had Shawn Smith officiate four home games since he became a head referee in 2018, and they are all losses. Date Opponent Result Score Nov 24, 2024 vs. Kansas City Chiefs Loss 27–30 Oct 9, 2022 vs. San Francisco 49ers Loss 15–37 Dec 12, 2021 vs. Atlanta Falcons Loss 21–29 Nov 25, 2018 vs. Seattle Seahawks Loss 27–30 Considering the how rare it is for Shawn Smith to officiate a Panthers game at all, this seems like an odd time to assign him to a Panthers game, unless the NFL wants to kill the Panthers season once and for all.  The Panthers' offensive line situation creates a "perfect storm" for referee Shawn Smith's specific tendency to call False Starts on the home team. The "Carousel" Factor (Communication Vulnerability) The most damning stat for the Panthers' offensive line in 2025 is their lack of continuity. The Stat: By Week 13, the Panthers had already fielded their 10th different offensive line combination. The Impact: False starts are often "communication penalties"—they happen when a guard doesn't hear the center's snap count or a tackle anticipates the wrong cadence. A unit that hasn't played together struggles with non-verbal communication. The Shawn Smith Multiplier: Shawn Smith’s crew calls False Starts at a high rate on home teams. He will likely look for flinches on the exterior of the line. A disjointed line that is constantly rotating players (due to the injuries of starters like Cade Mays and the illness issues with Robert Hunt earlier this season) is "fresh meat" for this specific referee bias. The Specific Culprits (2025 Penalties) Ikem Ekwonu (LT): Leads the team with 4 False Start penalties this season. He is the most frequent violator on the line. Taylor Moton (RT): Has been flagged for 3 False Starts. The Trap: Smith’s crew often focuses on the tackles (the players furthest from the ball) jumping early to get an edge on speed rushers. Since Ekwonu struggles with this discipline naturally, having a referee who hunts for it is a massive disadvantage. The "Managed Outcome" Synthesis The "Bucs Cover" Script: If the desired outcome is a Buccaneers win to solidify their playoff standing, the officials simply have to apply the letter of the law. Calling strict False Starts on a confused, banged-up Panthers O-line will consistently put them in "3rd and Long" situations, killing their drives and allowing the Bucs (-3.5) to cover easily. The "Close Game" Script: If the desired outcome is "Week 18 Drama" (keeping the division tied), look for the officials to ignore the Panthers' twitchy tackles. If Ekwonu jumps a split-second early and no flag is thrown, it effectively neutralizes the Bucs' pass rush, allowing the Panthers to keep the score close. Summary of the Edge Vulnerability: Extreme. The Panthers are playing backup interior linemen (like Jake Curhan or practice squad call-ups) next to jumpy tackles. Betting Implication: This strongly reinforces the Bucs -3 or -3.5 play. The combination of a "Road Team Referee" and a "Home Team O-Line in chaos" suggests the Panthers will beat themselves with procedural penalties. Based on the collision of the hard data (Referee bias + Offensive Line injuries) and the soft narratives ("Managed Outcomes"), here is the definitive recommendation. If you have to place a single Moneyline bet to win this game straight up: The Pick: Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-165) While the "Entertainment Script" hints at a Panthers upset to keep the division messy, the structural disadvantage the Panthers face in this specific matchup is too massive to ignore. Here is why the Buccaneers are the stong moneyline play: 1. The "Shawn Smith" Road-Field Advantage This is the decisive factor. In the NFL, Home Field Advantage usually accounts for about 1.5 to 2 points of value. The Reality: Referee Shawn Smith negates that advantage entirely. His crew calls penalties in a way that historically suppresses home crowd momentum (False Starts, holding). The Result: You are essentially getting the Buccaneers on a neutral field (or even a "pseudo-home" field) against a team with a worse roster. 2. The "Drive-Killer" Synergy To win as an underdog, the Panthers need to play a clean, mistake-free game to keep drives alive. The combination of Panthers' 10th O-Line combo + Jump-prone Tackles (Ekwonu) + A Referee who hunts False Starts is a recipe for disaster. The Scenario: Expect the Panthers to face multiple "1st and 15" or "3rd and 12" situations due to procedural flags. These drive-killers will force them to punt or settle for field goals, while the Bucs' offense (led by Mayfield) stays on schedule. 3. The "TV Product" Counter-Argument You asked about the "Managed Outcome." While a Panthers win creates "chaos," the NFL also values Star Power in the playoffs. Baker Mayfield and the Buccaneers are a proven national TV draw with recent playoff history. If the league has to choose between "Chaos" (Panthers) and "Ratings/Legitimacy" (Bucs), the "Script" likely leans toward ensuring the Buccaneers—the more marketable team—secure the division lead. They won't "fix" the game against the Panthers, but they won't intervene to save them from their own penalties. Final Verdict Betting on the Panthers requires you to hope for a miracle 4th-quarter collapse. Betting on the Buccaneers requires you to trust that a superior roster—aided by a favorable officiating crew—will control the game for the first 45 minutes. Take the Buccaneers Moneyline. The "Safe" money is on the Ref. The Prediction: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Win and Cover Projected Score: Buccaneers 27, Panthers 17 The Bet: Buccaneers -3 (or Moneyline -165) Confidence Level: High on the Winner; Moderate on the Spread (due to potential "garbage time" variance).
    • He isn't a good HC. I think he has proved that conclusively.
    • The missed tackle percentage is on that screen cap.
×
×
  • Create New...