Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Penn State...what did Paterno know?

g5jamz

By g5jamz,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

Cough, drop your keys, slam a door, SOMEfugINGTHING. He does nothing. How does he even look himself in the mirror.

And some people are treating him like a hero in this case.....because he testified to the grand jury.

His non actions allowed this to continue for 9 more years. One call with eye witness testimony would have had Sandusky off the streets immediately.

Everyone is speculating on what Paterno was or wasn't told. His own admissions make McQueary a POS.

He is more of a POS than even the AD in this situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carolina Husker Newbie

Carolina Husker

Posted
Posted

Only those of us who deal in facts.....rather than speculation and your own personal biases.

If you say that you know what he was told, you are either a complete idiot or a liar....or in your case, both.

Your total SPECULATION of what Paterno was told is based on the testimony of McQueary.

A guy who admittedly witnessed the rape of a 10 yo boy and turned and walked away from it.

A guy who admittedly witnessed the rape of a 10 yo boy and did NOT go to the police.

A guy who admittedly witnessed the rape of a 10 yo boy and whose only action was to mention it to the head coach.

A guy who admittedly witnessed the rape of a 10 yo boy and who never followed up after telling Paterno anything.

The guy is covering his ass right now and trying to make it look like he has no fault in this.

Apparently being a psychopath isn't limited just to the PSU fans in Happy Valley...

I've already made my point about McCleary. At the very least Paterno was told about "something of a sexual nature" of a 10 year old boy. He definitely knew more, but that doesn't really matter. It's noble of you to pretend your fearless leader is just a bystander in all of this, that he can't be trusted because of all those things above (that I agree with) about McCleary, but that blurb from the indictment alone is enough for all the derision being heaped on him. Not really anyone's fault but your own if you choose to be a denier, but it doesn't really matter, because the evidence against Paterno and those who hold your line of thought is overwhelming, as is the public sentiment. This is his legacy. Dealwithit.

I tried the fact vs. speculation thing with husker and was denied.

I've already asked you to explain your point about Sandusky being a professor or whatever the hell it was. Can you manage to do that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mrs Pantherfan Newbie

Mrs Pantherfan

Posted
Posted

What about the local district attorney that shut the case down back in 1998??? Child Welfare did nothing either???

“Sandusky admitted showering naked with Victim 6, admitted to hugging Victim 6 while in the shower and admitted that it was wrong,” said the report issued last weekend by the Pennsylvania attorney general. “Detective Schreffler advised Sandusky not to shower with any child again and Sandusky said that he would not.”

um..ok...and you believed him?? wtf?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

oh, the reviews...

100% false advertising by Mr. Sandusky. Not a single page in this book "touches" on how to appropriately gain the trust of young, at-risk boys, and then use that trust to perpetrate horrifying sexual assaults on the very children who turned to you for guidance and support. Almost as disappointing as the first time I watched "Touched by an Angel." Don't even get me started on that bullcrap. I still can't watch anything with Della Reese in it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Rising Star

Montsta

Posted
Posted

I just read that the little boy saw McQueary. Is that true?

That's what the indictment says. McQueary is just as guilty as anybody in all of this, but at least he has been given a nod as "extremely credible" in all of this according to the Grand Jury. Curley and Schultz, not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Rising Star

Montsta

Posted
Posted

bro I couldn't make it past the second page. It was like something out of scary movie.

The seven or so pages dedicated to Victim 2 or particularly difficult to read. I made the mistake of reading it on my lunch break yesterday. Needless to say, I didn't even finish half of my Quizno's sub. Lost my appetite, and I'm glad I at least ate half before I started, or I wouldn't have eaten anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...