Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New iMac...


the butch

Recommended Posts

This thing is huge. Had to get a new computer bc my 5 year old Dell broke down. And I will say this...Windows blows! Compared to Mac's OS 10 that is. Got the 24" on sale + student discount. If you're in the market for a new cpu, desktop not laptop (apple laptops are too overpriced - u still get what you pay for tho), then go with the new iMacs.

Here's a screen shot:

167vw1z.jpg

That is all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like macs but if something goes wrong, u just about have to send it back to apple and wait for them to fix it.. At least with a PC...if i cant fix it i can take it down the road and have it back in a day or two...Macs are better for business and people who dont play games...i had a mac and did not like the way it played games..(the few that were availible)

So for now.....Im a PC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Makes are overpriced for what you get. On top of that, OSx is a pretty good OS, but I prefer a system that I have more control over. Not just a mystery box that "works." I recently bought a new laptop and I heavily considered getting a Macbook, but I decided I wasn't going to pay twice as much for the same computing power when the only real difference was OSx. I'm just fine with Windows and when Windows 7 comes out, I'll be even happier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(apple laptops are too overpriced - u still get what you pay for tho)

HAHA. get what you pay for? you can get a windows laptop that'll last you for 5 years with equal specs to the best mac laptop for about 600 bucks.

macs are for suckers who consider "white or pink" to be the system specs they need to worry about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HAHA. get what you pay for? you can get a windows laptop that'll last you for 5 years with equal specs to the best mac laptop for about 600 bucks.

macs are for suckers who consider "white or pink" to be the system specs they need to worry about.

srsly, yu hav no idea wut yer talkin' bout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HAHA. get what you pay for? you can get a windows laptop that'll last you for 5 years with equal specs to the best mac laptop for about 600 bucks.

macs are for suckers who consider "white or pink" to be the system specs they need to worry about.

HAHA. What are YOU smokin? Probably the most generic based bias I've ever heard. If you're gonna be bias at least make an original argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would be happy with Lomu or Iheanachor at 19. Fano is intriguing but I don't think he makes it.
    • II see it this way: We have to look at long-term needs and current depth.  We have filled some key spots with players on one-year contracts.  I firmly believe that they intend to pay Bryce some big bucks next year.  That means you cannot hope that your rookies in 2027 can fill the spots vacated by the veterans you could not afford to re-sign.   We need to consider the cap and the fact that the need to start a rookie is not viewed as a positive by coaches and general managers, but they value first contracts--so it is a delicate balance. I think they have to look at the cap by position--"Can we afford a $50m QB and a $100m OL?  That is half the cap, before you pay your WRs and RBs and TEs.  They need to start getting younger on the OL as well.   I am not suggesting that we draft OT in round 1, but we could and I would get it.  RT on a 1-year deal, they may have intel about Ickey (who was not the best LT, to be honest) and 32-year old Moton is on a bad wheel.   Now if you go by Morgan's history, you can almost tell what position we are going to address with the first pick by noting the positions he has not focused on in free agency.  DT, considering the lack of performance by those not named Derrick Brown and the loss of Robinson, is screaming to be addressed with a top player.  Wharton is not an early down DT (DE if you want to get technical) and our LBs need to be clean--they were not in 2025.  Look for a DT early. I also think we will address ILB (pass covering Will) on day 2.  The other day 2 pick will be an OT, in my view. Do not rule out CB.  We are thin there too, and Jackson is in his final year.  I am not sure that we love Smith-Wade.  Some crackhead on here talked about moving him to S----stay tuned.   Hopefully, a team wanting Ty Simpson will move up and offer us a pick or two to move back. DT WILB OT OC QB  (you heard it here 337th--but this pick could come sooner than you think.      
    • Bryce had some bad games, but he had some good ones as well (and this is coming from a Bryce skeptic). I think it's a little simplistic to put all the offensive woes on Bryce, you also should be looking at O-line play, receiver play, RB and TE play, and also coaching. There's no way when I look at the offense in it's totality am I ready to say that a so-so to bad offense was all on Bryce, and, I also can't say that we don't need to upgrade any position on offense, save Tetairoa McMillan (who also wasn't perfect) and maybe the starting guards and T-mo.
×
×
  • Create New...