Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

MW3 or Battlefield 3?


donkeyd

Recommended Posts

Which one is better and why?

Personally I dont think that MW3 can beat battlefield for the online gameplay. Its not instant gratification like MW3 but its the shiznit for the strategy and skill required to win. I also love that the KD ratio is a non-factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

k/d ratio could be a nonfactor in cod but too many people use it as their gold standard already. it's also because 1 person is able to dominate an entire round. whereas 1 person can easily be avoided in bf3.

i tend to like battlefield because once the launch day twats leave for other games, it tends to level off from the dumbassery and generally gets better and more fun to play. whereas cod gets people asking for nerfs for certain weapons because so much of the game is on the guns. i.e. AK74uMAD?, famas, etc.

It's also because bf3 allows on-the-fly adjustment for what you carry. You die, you can change to adapt. not just classes you set before the match and get screwed for having because some guy is being a douche with a certain gun.

also no kill streaks. just vehicles that you need skill to control.

they really are apples and oranges though. totally different play styles required. it's just a matter of taste and preference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apples and oranges. Depends on what kind of FPS you like. COD is more of a run and gun twitch shooter. Battlefield is a game based around teamwork and strategy. Both are good at what they do. Also, Battlefield has bigger maps, vehicles and destructible environments. I prefer Battlefield myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like either game much but if I had to choose I'd say MW3. In Battlefield the maps are too large and the spawn points are too far away. MW3 you spend most of your time actually doing something that is productive and fun. BF3 most time is wasted waiting to respawn or traveling to where the enemy is. Both take way too long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apples and oranges. Depends on what kind of FPS you like. COD is more of a run and gun twitch shooter. Battlefield is a game based around teamwork and strategy. Both are good at what they do. Also, Battlefield has bigger maps, vehicles and destructible environments. I prefer Battlefield myself.

I'd agree with this. It's like comparing Burnout Paradise to Gran Turismo. I'll take Burnout Paradise any day of the week over GT, but that's because I like arcade racers and exploring towns in cars as opposed to driving in a circle and turning left for 48 hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's funny that people think MW3 is instant gratification and BF3 isn't. What is the spawn wait time on BF3, like 5 seconds tops?

My point was that in BF3 it takes time and teamwork to win the game. (At least on Rush and Conquest.) Also the instant gratification in MW3 is greater because of killstreaks and smaller maps. I think in BF3 that the reward doesn't come as often but when it does it feels better making the game overall more fun. Also, I am so sick of the stupid sh*t in COD like spawn camping, having to unload an entire clip to kill someone and 5 year olds running around with overpowered weapons. Also, when there are 2 people playing under the same account i.e. dbo5001(2) it leads to an unfair advantage because the teammate can see where you are through the split screen. Im not saying COD is bad. Hell I played the the crap out of mw2 and black ops but MW3 is just disappointing. Its the same stuff with different maps. MW2.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My projection. I think at WR its time to go with youth. This means Moore should be the odd man out. Horn can return both punts and kicks and Tremayne is a better WR than Moore. XL gets one more year to prove himself, although I could see a trade in the future which would mean Moore could stay. For OL, I would like us to bring back Brady if we can. The RBs, Trevor can return both punts and kicks too. With the uncertainty of Brooks and Dillon, its hard to choose either one. I think the team would like for Brooks to have a breakout season to clear any uncertainty that he deserves a spot. For now, I have them both even and on the team. DL looks solid as well as OLB. Watch out for the UDFA of Aaron Hall and Isaiah Smith at OLB. They look promising and could knock someone off the team. ILB is still the biggest weakness on the team. We need to upgrade that any means necessary. CB is strong and Im praying to all the Gods that Wheatley beats out Scott at FS.  OFFENSE: WR: Tetairoa McMillan - *Chris Brazzell II* - Brycen Tremayne TE: Tommy Tremble - James Mitchell LT: #Rasheed Walker# - *Monroe Freeling* LG: Damien Lewis C- #Luke Fortner# - *Sam Hecht* RG: Robert Hunt - #Saahdiq Charles# RT: Taylor Moton - #Stone Forsythe# TE: Ja`Tavion Sanders - Mitchell Evans WR: Xavier Legette - Jalen Coker - Jimmy Horn Jr. QB: Bryce Young - #Kenny Pickett# RB: Chuba Hubbard - Trevor Etienne - #AJ Dillon# - Jonathon Brooks DEFENSE: LE: Tershawn Wharton - Bobby Brown III  NT: *Lee Hunter* - Cam Jackson RE: Derrick Brown - LaBryan Ray LOLB: Nic Scourton - Patrick Jones II  LILB: Trevin Wallace - Bam Martin-Scott - *Jackson Kuwatch* RILB: #Devin Lloyd# - Claudin Cherrelus  ROLB: #Jaelen Phillips# - Princely Umanmielen LCB: Jaycee Horn - Akayleb Evans RCB: Mike Jackson - *Will Lee III* - Chau Smith-Wade SS: Tre`von Moehrig - Lathan Ransom FS:  Nick Scott - *Zakee Wheatley* - Demani Richardson  SPECIAL TEAMS: K/KO: Ryan Fitzgerald P/H: Sam Martin KR: Trevor Etienne - Jimmy Horn Jr. PR: Trevor Etienne - Jimmy Horn Jr. LS: J.J. Jansen  * = Draft Pick # = Free Agent / Trade () = Undrafted Free Agent  
    • His contract is guaranteed.  Legette is just not where he needs to be mentally.  Not fully invested, it seems. 
    • Literally like Hill. He's not QB1 material (now or ever), but if we can turn him into a H-back and use him like  Swiss army knife, that's his ticket to make the roster.  H-back/emergency QB.  I wonder how good his hands are?  If they are at least above average by NFL standards then we can line him up in the backfield, in the slot, split out wide and of course, in the Wildcat.
×
×
  • Create New...