Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

X-Men Origins: Wolverine


Its The Milk

Recommended Posts

I just hope they stay true. From what Ive seen in the previews, hes got his claws as a kid. Um, no. I get them having to use literary license, like him and Sabretooth not knowin each other in the first movie, but the claws as a kid? C'mon...

On a side note Ive read that Daniel Negraneu has a part in the film. Dont know how big of a part, but could be interesting...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just hope they stay true. From what Ive seen in the previews, hes got his claws as a kid. Um, no. I get them having to use literary license, like him and Sabretooth not knowin each other in the first movie, but the claws as a kid? C'mon...

On a side note Ive read that Daniel Negraneu has a part in the film. Dont know how big of a part, but could be interesting...

they shoulda just stuck to the original miniseries imo. Japan, ninjas, etc. Then they coulda gone back and told the origin story. They always try to cram too many goddamned characters into these movies and it makes them weak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they shoulda just stuck to the original miniseries imo. Japan, ninjas, etc. Then they coulda gone back and told the origin story. They always try to cram too many goddamned characters into these movies and it makes them weak.

The original miniseries? The one that introduced, I forget the name, but he was somw sorta vampire? And had 2 women helping Wolverine, one of which was formerly SpiderWoman? And the grey Hulk comes in around the 5th issue?

But I do agree, they do focus more on quantity than quality. Letting B.Singer leave to direct SupermanReturns instead of X3 was a horrible mistake...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just hope they stay true. From what Ive seen in the previews, hes got his claws as a kid. Um, no. I get them having to use literary license, like him and Sabretooth not knowin each other in the first movie, but the claws as a kid? C'mon...

On a side note Ive read that Daniel Negraneu has a part in the film. Dont know how big of a part, but could be interesting...

I was very skeptical of the claws as a kid thing as well. My room mate came in and explained it to me and I kept telling him " No, Wolverine got his claws from an experiment when he was in his adult years. " He kept trying to convince me that I was wrong. Upon watching the movie I get it now. I am not a X-Men loremaster or anything but it definitely makes sense from the casual X-Men fan.

I don't want to spoil the movie for anyone so hopefully you know what I am talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...