Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question for veterans...


Stumpy

Recommended Posts

I had an interesting discussion with my father (20 years US Army) last night, and I wanted to get the opinion of some other veterans on this issue.

Some background...

On Monday, a buddy that my brother served with in Iraq was shot and killed by NC State Troopers. Without going into too many details, he fled the scene of a wreck and was shot after firing on the officers.

He had recently returned from his second tour, and had come home, as many veterans do, to a life very different than the one he left behind. (business/family issues) He obviously was having trouble dealing with these problems and this very likely led to his confrontation with the officers.

So, my question is, do you believe that the military should institute some sort of mandatory exit counseling program for servicemen returning from overseas?

Not just for PTSD or other combat related issues, but also to help deal with the effects of having to put your life on hold for 1-2 years at a time.

The issues that our veterans face returning from overseas go far beyond what they experienced while they were there, but often what has changed once they get back.

The stories are far too common of servicemen coming home to find that their wife/girlfriend has left. Friends/family have moved away or are simply no longer there for them. Many Guardsmen/Reservists, in particular, have small businesses that cannot be sustained with them being deployed for a year or more.

I know that the military offers extensive counseling for those that ask for it. But as we all know, we as humans are often too proud to ask for help with matters of depression/mental illness. So, should the military require returning servicemen to go through a comprehensive exit counseling program before returning home?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had an interesting discussion with my father (20 years US Army) last night, and I wanted to get the opinion of some other veterans on this issue.

Some background...

On Monday, a buddy that my brother served with in Iraq was shot and killed by NC State Troopers. Without going into too many details, he fled the scene of a wreck and was shot after firing on the officers.

He had recently returned from his second tour, and had come home, as many veterans do, to a life very different than the one he left behind. (business/family issues) He obviously was having trouble dealing with these problems and this very likely led to his confrontation with the officers.

So, my question is, do you believe that the military should institute some sort of mandatory exit counseling program for servicemen returning from overseas?

Not just for PTSD or other combat related issues, but also to help deal with the effects of having to put your life on hold for 1-2 years at a time.

The issues that our veterans face returning from overseas go far beyond what they experienced while they were there, but often what has changed once they get back.

The stories are far too common of servicemen coming home to find that their wife/girlfriend has left. Friends/family have moved away or are simply no longer there for them. Many Guardsmen/Reservists, in particular, have small businesses that cannot be sustained with them being deployed for a year or more.

I know that the military offers extensive counseling for those that ask for it. But as we all know, we as humans are often too proud to ask for help with matters of depression/mental illness. So, should the military require returning servicemen to go through a comprehensive exit counseling program before returning home?

The military, at least active duty, does have mandatory counseling for separating soldiers. However, this is mainly geared towards people who have no experience in the civilian workforce and usually sets unrealistic expectations.

The guy you are talking about was a National Guardsman. They're basically given some paperwork that says "I was there" and sent on their ways. I read about this guys story about being divorced and losing his business while injuries may have prevented him from performing manual labor. To me, this seems like a clear case of suicide by cop. I think the guy was overwhelmed by issues and I doubt any counseling he received would have helped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...