Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Yahoo! Picks pan out, we'll be sitting pretty


GRWatcher

Recommended Posts

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=weeknflpicksgiantmatchup&prov=tsn&type=lgns

They have:

Cowboys over Giants

Bears over Saints

Falcons over Bucs

Bengals over Redskins (upset of the week)

Cardinals over Vikings

If all this plays out, it would make the Panthers vs Giants game larger than even now. A straight up battle for the #1 seed.

I love this time of year when we're doing well. :party:

::imagine dance smiley here::

:biggrinjester:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless of any other games, we control our own destiny. Win out and we take the number 1 seed

True enough sir.

But it feels real good to see someone in the media picking all the teams we want to lose to actually lose this weekend.

It would be a true gift grom the Football Gods. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah everyone keeps talking about if the Giants lose to the cowboys. We play them, it doesn't matter if they lose. They could go 1-2 over the next 3 and we go 2-1 and we would still be number 2 seed if their one win comes against us. We need to go 3-0 to get that one seed. I personally want the Giants to win so our game means that much more and i want the Cowboys out of the playoff hunt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm being positive and assuming we'll win out. That said as much as I hate the Cowgirls I'd prefer to see the Giants win that game. It won't have any affect on our chances for the #1...again assuming we win out. Plus if we win and the Cowgirls lose we officially clinch a playoff spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=weeknflpicksgiantmatchup&prov=tsn&type=lgns

They have:

Cowboys over Giants

Bears over Saints

Falcons over Bucs

Bengals over Redskins (upset of the week)

Cardinals over Vikings

Not exactly going out on a limb:

Dal favored by 3

Chi favored by 3

Atl favored by 3

Arz favored by 3

Only picking Was (favored by 7) to lose in an upset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Screw picks.

If we beat Denver and Dallas loses we are IN THE PLAYOFFS.

If we beat Denver and Atlanta loses we are IN THE PLAYOFFS.

I'm more interested in being IN than the damn seeding right now.

They have both the Cowboys and Falcons winning, which guarantees us nothing at all Playoff wise. Let's win our game first and foremost, but also have the Giants win. Then we can control our destiny when we meet them there. I do want Atlanta to win, though. All the more reason for us to pull for the NYG and that Dallas loss. We need Tampa as far away from taking the division as possible. I do not want to play them in Tampa in the Playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no scenario that makes the NO's game meaningless....we're playing for #1 seed...it will be meaningful regardless. :confused:

Exactly. We will be one game behind the Giants if we beat them and they win the last game. Starters will be in for both sides if home field is on the line in the last game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 600 I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...