Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

1st Rd Starters


stirs

Recommended Posts

You would assume that every team very much wants their first rounder to be able to start in the coming season especially if you are picking top ten. Given that, which guys can start on our team and will be around when we pick. I would say only these 4 guys:

Coples

DeCastro

Rieff

Brockers

Does this mean that a GM would go this route?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All that you listed plus:

Blackmon

Still

Martin

Kirkpatrick

Jenkins

By all accounts, Blackmon won't be there, don't agree on Still or Martin and have my doubts about Kirkpatrick.

Maybe Jenkins, not sure we would take him that early though

Just my opinion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and Reiff/Martin/any OT outside of Kalil - only if Otah is injured. Otah's better than any of them but Kalil if he's healthy (and if he's not, fug it. After two years off, IR him again and give Bell one more year to show he might be able to play RT and then get a RT next year if not. RTs don't get drafted as high, could probably get a good one wherever we pick next year).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BPA in draft all the way. Address your biggest needs in free agency.  
    • Exactly.  You let him play out next season and continue to develop Thorton.  Jackson’s earned his next contract, but his age and the risk of tying up such a large portion of the payroll at one position leads me to believe that we’ll let him walk. In all likelihood, we’ll draft another CB, or two, and bring in some journeymen to fill the roster void, between now and the start of the 2027 season.  That’ll create more balance financially across the roster enabling us to invest in other areas.  
    • As far as the NFCS … I think this division will be hotly contested the next couple of years.   I am tending to pay more respect to both Atlanta and the Saints n terms of how strong they will be moving forward, than not.    I am mixed on Ryan but think they have a decent roster to start with. I don’t think he blundered hiring Stefanski. And that offense can be dangerous with a QB. Plus, defense is arrow up. No 1st round pick, WB issues will dull their effectiveness. Question is, to what degree?   I think Moore is going to be a good HC and can overcome tape that people have on Shough. They need a lot but they were playing with people. Just the way you want to see all the way to the end.    Not sure about Tampa they have Mayfield but I don’t think they can maintain their success and Bowles is not going to last much longer. They have to go through all that. Gonna be tough once it starts. Might already have started.    For us I feel pretty good about Morgan. But less so about our offense, we have some short term RB and OL issues and those things are critical given what we are working with at QB.  Overall, mixed. Like a lot of what I see but some major question marks remain.     
×
×
  • Create New...