Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hurney interview...


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

interview with hurney...

http://www.850thebuzz.com/blog/?p=9223

big points

1.Has talked about some spread offense packages here

2.thinks the WR is deep.

3.thinks DE is deep

4.thinks CB is deep

did not mention DT so i am thinking we will take a DT with our first pick..since hurney thinks DE and CB are deep think we will take one later..and i think we might take a WR in the later rounds if we get more picks..

i wish hurney could give interviews with someone that knows what questions to ask...like about our new DEF scheme

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because the Panthers take needs, not the best player available.

I disagree, in our 2007 draft it was 100% BPA, which is how we ended up with Beason and Kalil even though there wasn't a pressing need at that position. Same goes for the 2008 draft after the first round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Murph - Thats a good assumption to go by, but you have to figure as most of your team is filled with its starters... they'll look to grab other spots where they need to address depth and develop a young guy and plug them in some. DT would be the perfect fit in the 2nd round as the depth of DT is bad in this draft. I see it being very hard to pass up on a good DT prospect if there isn't any other depth worth taking later in the draft. Thats just my assumption on that, but having Moore and McCown backing Jake just leads me to believe that the Panthers will sway from even taking a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we typically take BPA but you can argue any of the picks as need or BPA. The fact is that every now and then a pick is both or a weighted combination of the two.

It's the dawn of the apocalypse, I agree with you. Stewart probably fell more on the needs side of the coin (not that it turned out we needed him more, but I think that's what the FO thought). I think Otah and Godfrey both happened to fall as both need and BPA, and Dan Connor was clearly a case of BPA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dan Connor sure as hell wasn't a need pick, so to say that they only pick for need is rediculous. You could also argue that Stewart and Otah were the best available players where they were picked.

..but both were also needs...i think fox will do BPA but will fill our needs at DT and DE first..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They knew Morgan was coming to an end even though they gave him a new contract. Beason was a need.

I disagree, they even had Beason slated to be OLB from the time they drafted him. While it's apparent now that MLB was a need, at the time that wasn't the consensus.

If you also look at the DJ, Kalil, Godfrey, Rosario, Shaw, Connor, and Barnidge picks over the past two years it's fairly evident that we subscribe heavily to the BPA philosophy. There are times we will go out and grab a player at a needed position (Davis, Stewart and Otah) generally we feel safer going after talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right now, XL is probably outside the top 100 NFL WR's. That is just not going to cut it.  He certainly could turn it around but our track record in this area is very well established. When our WR's bust, boy do they bust. XL looks exactly like so many of those cases.  XL has been the 9th most productive WR in that 2024 class and is likely to slip to 10th very soon as one of the guys who missed a large chunk of last season is about to pass him(Pearsall) in career production. That's not great for the 7th overall WR picked. It's a disappointment, without question. Even a the guy getting healthy scratches has still outperformed him so far.  And, for the record, it was a very, very productive WR class so far.
    • 4th read? On a playaction? Do you not watch the ALL 22? There were 4 receivers on that play. Only 2 went beyond 2 yards on a 10 yard crossing route in front of a single high safety. The TE stayed in to block before releasing on a drag route and was never a read. Coker was motioned to the right to pull a defender to the sideline. This was a clear flat route and hot if the defender came on a blitz. The RB stayed in to block on the right side. Coming out of the playaction Bryce spots the defender for a possible blitz and then goes to his primary receiver on his left. The only receiver on the left coming out of the playaction was TMac. He clearly follows TMac to the cross in front of the safety and looks off the safety to the left. This is not a read to XL. It's looking off the safety. He swings his vision back to his primary in TMac and throws the ball to the numbers (20) 10 yards over the head of the DB when TMac reaches the right hashes near the 30 yard line before TMac even makes a cut. Bryce was never leading or throwing to the receiver. He was throwing to a spot based on the movement of 2 defenders. It was up to TMac to make this play happen with perfect timing, release, sell and cut on his route. Give credit to the play design. The defense is playing that route as a sideline route and TMac makes it happen with his body position and control as he cuts/drifts 10 yards up field to the spot he knew it was going to before the play. If that were a 4th progression read out of a playaction, you'd see 4 hitch steps and the receiver would have been led to the sideline as TMac would have never known the ball was going to be thrown 10 yards over the DBs head on a 10 yard cross to the sideline. You can also tell this is the desgin as Bryce sets to the left out of the playaction with XL on his right before the cross. Then he takes 3 bounce steps to move with the pocket as XL is late to the cross. His first hitch step is to the right after TMac crosses, which is followed by an immediate throw before a cut is made by TMac. TMac was the only receiver to the left on Bryce's set, and he was one of 2 WRs to the right on Bryce's first and only hitch step. Give TMac and the play design a bulk of the credit. Bryce did well, but he didn't sell the playaction or a possible pass to XL very well. He did do very well at throwing to a predetermined spot on the field after TMac set up that crossing route perfectly with XL and Sanders both late on developing their routes. Did you catch all that on the play? For some reason, you think there were 4 progressions out of play action with the defense pressing, Bryce setting his hips to the left with all 3 receivers on the right side of what you think was his 4th option as the only receiver on the left at the snap, and only 1 hitch step to the right after TMac waits for XL to cross left. Why would you think a QB would set their hips to the left when their first 3 progressions are on the right side of the field?
    • Agreed, however there are many QBs that don't place it perfectly.  
×
×
  • Create New...