Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Super Bowl Heading To London?


Kevin Greene

Recommended Posts

I would go so far as to say it (NFLE) was "successful", I dont recall it ever beign self-sufficient ans was heavily subsidized by the NFL. I believe that they only faintly hoped it would become successful- Europeans would rather hold out for the real thing, instead of a poor substitute...the NFLE did however begin to generate interest in the game...however it has not permeated the fabic of their society as basketball has done- the biggest sign that a country is embracing a sport it to see kids striving to join the most elite leagues of that sport- Football in Europe is stillas foreign to those kids as hockey is to those in the south- (Friggin the Hurrincanes Won the STANLEY CUP and there are people in NC/SC who done even know that we have a team- This long ramble was to just point out that the NFL is King of the US sports world and that is great for now but to contiue to gain market share only in the US is a recipe for disaster- THE NFL And US should really begin pushing for football to become an olympic sport, get the kids involved, and then start expanding teams as an entire division there-that way they generate rivariles and travel is somewhat limited back and forth across the pond-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is a Super Bowl in London that different from a Super Bowl in Houston for the millions watching on TV?

The only thing it will affect are the folks going to the game. Frankly the flight and hotel seem reasonable considering a scalped ticket is going for 2 grand alone.

I think it would be great to go to the Superbowl and see London. Kills 2 birds with one stone.

The problem is the weather- field conditions- and logistics-

all these thing have adversely effected the two games played there already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally the Superbowl should be in the HOME stadium of the higher seed, to give the fan base not only a reward for supporting their team, but to give a boost to the local economies-

I know there are specific logistical requirements, ie 4-5 star hotels (multiples), parking, other housing, event centers, etc. but most if not all the NFL teams (if I am not mistaken) even in small markets like the Panthers are in or really near Big cities that can handle this- In this economy where coporate support of the Superbowl is down anyway why not boost the local economies!!! This last Superbowl was one of the cheapest ever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

From an article on ESPN today:

"According to the Sunday Telegraph, the Super Bowl could be worth $521.1 million to the London economy..."

That's a hell of a lot of moolah to export out of this country in good OR bad times! Ah go on, Roger...you do this poo and I might be done with the NFL for good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter where it's played chances are you and most likely most people you know can't afford to go. The NFL has topped out on pricing the brand. The empty seats across the league including the playoffs showed this. They have two options accept their lot and make things more affordable to their base, or expand the base to new markets willing to spend.

They should go ahead and do the former, drop salaries and ticket prices to maintain consistent profits. They have to look no further than nascar to see what shunning the base does for a brand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's basically like bringing major Soccer events over here, it's stupid. One game doesn't make a difference, it's not like they will understand the game, thus they probably won't enjoy it very much. To enjoy a sport for the most part, you really have to understand the strategy. Also, it's a middle finger to the millions of fans here in the US that love football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Goodell is the worst Commissioner in NFL history. He's turning the NFL into a pussy league with all these new rules. A player is considered lucky if he isn't fined after making a hard hit. Especially if its on the QB. Its ridiculous the amount of rules that are in place specifically just for the QB. This isn't f*cking golf, THIS IS FOOTBALL!!!

Now he wants to screw over fans by moving games over seas and to other countries. What happens when a team like the Lions or Dolphins finally make it to the Super Bowl, but none of their fans can see them in the big game cause its in f*cking London? That would be really messed up. Im surprised the NFLPA hasn't stepped in and took a stand against him. But it seems as though all of them only care about 1 thing these days...money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

send them the probowl. nobody really cares about it anyway. also. i am pretty sure i wouldn't be able to boycott completely. i could get by without buying new gear, but i have to watch the panthers every time they play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

send them the probowl. nobody really cares about it anyway. also. i am pretty sure i wouldn't be able to boycott completely. i could get by without buying new gear, but i have to watch the panthers every time they play.

I agree with that. Send them the Pro Bowl, nothing more. They f*cked themselves by getting rid of NFL Europe, in terms of trying to spread the popularity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...