Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Aikem Hicks...oh Canada!


jramsey4

Recommended Posts

With all the Brockers/Poe talk I think a guy that gets left out of the conversation is Hicks. The guys a beast at 6'5" 320. He has some surprising good moves he showed off at the Shrine game and is a tremendous athlete. Probably a 4th-5th round prospect that I view as Brockers without the risk. With the right coaching he could be a stud at 3 tech. If you haven't heard of him check out this vid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he was all i was talking about during the shrine game. i watched some youtube tape on him and the guy is athletic as crap for his size. he even lined up at a rush OLB in canada and was effective at that spot. if no DT is picked in the 1st two rounds, i wouldnt mind him in the 4th just so we could have him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he was all i was talking about during the shrine game. i watched some youtube tape on him and the guy is athletic as crap for his size. he even lined up at a rush OLB in canada and was effective at that spot. if no DT is picked in the 1st two rounds, i wouldnt mind him in the 4th just so we could have him.

My thoughts exactly. I would cream myself if the draft went Decastro, Tru Johnson CB, and then Hicks. 3 tremendous athletes at positions of need. He seems to be a hard working humble kid. That along with athletic ability could turn into something special.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we don't get Brockers, Poe or Cox in the 1st or don't get Still in the 2nd I'd love this guy in the 4th. He might go higher though. Hell, even if we did get one of those others, I wouldn't mind doubling up again at DT this year and getting this kid in the 4th. With what we have at DT, we need all the competition we can get. Let the cream rise and cut the rest after camp.

Brockers in the 1st, Gilmore/Minnifield/whatever CB or Chandler Jones/Cam Johnson in the second, then Hicks in the 4th,

OR

Coples in the 1st, Still in the 2nd, Hicks in the 4th

would make for a potentially awesome D-line. Assuming Still can stay healthy, with the second possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...