Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sorenson Wants Wr, Blackmon


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Tom Sorenson admits that he won't cry if we take Coples, Poe, or a solid defensive player, but he is hoping that Blackmon slips down, or that we possibly trade up.

Basically he is saying what more than a few people believe: Sometimes you just have to strike while the iron is hot. Anyway...here is the link. Moreover, he said remember how most of you were down on reaching for Newton...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are we the only top 5 offense going crazy over WR?

Well except maybe the Pat's but atleast all their WR are old.

All the others have deeper recieving options...also there stud leading the pack on most is younger than Smitty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the others have deeper recieving options...also there stud leading the pack on most is younger than Smitty.

Colston and Henderson really. I love Graham But we match up well with their other weapons.

I'll give you the Pack.

Detriot really only has Megatron.

I'll take #89, Lafell, Gettis, Olson over dertriot's crew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say that, notwithstanding his last line, but Sorenson is not crazy. How could we really leave Blackmon on the table at 9? Seriously.

Yes!!!

We had a top 5 offense adding another Wr won't make us stop people from putting up 485 points. Which is what we gave up last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colston and Henderson really. I love Graham But we match up well with their other weapons.

I'll give you the Pack.

Detriot really only has Megatron.

I'll take #89, Lafell, Gettis, Olson over dertriot's crew.

I'd have to take Detriot. Smitty at this stage of his career ain't on Megatrons level. TEs are decent. Other WRs are probably close to to being a wash overall.

I agree on NO though.

I think GB, NE and Det edge us out overall

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you act like if Blackmon or Floyd is here. Were going to score 45 points a game.

Even if that was possible. I don't want to be the team that has to out score everybody.

Cam needs to grow with whoever will be his #1 WR for the bulk of his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have to take Detriot. Smitty at this stage of his career ain't on Megatrons level. TEs are decent. Other WRs are probably close to to being a wash overall.

I agree on NO though.

I think GB, NE and Det edge us out overall

I'll give you Greenbay, NE not really WR but the 2 TE are beast. Other then Megatron I'm not giving you the lions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...