Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Home Purchase: Build To Order?


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

We really like the house and its seems exactly what we want. We can go and pick a lot we like and then the company will build a house for us from their 6 designs. It will take about 5-6 months for house to be build. How does this work? Do I need to get a loan and start paying for the house the second construction starts? Or do I make a down payment? I'm currently paying for rent and I'd hate to make almost 2 mortgage payments at the same time for next 6 months...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've done this before....you get approved for a loan then they draw against the loan after they get so far in the building process. You'll probably have to put some money down to get the contract, then get your own lender or use one of theirs to get approved. I've bought new houses like that before and it's good and bad. Good is that everything is new with a warranty...bad is that its being built in a neighborhood that's not established. If its got a HOA that usually sucks. New neighborhoods usually have few trees. Sometimes it takes awhile for values to be established and often your house is worth less than you paid until it builds stability and everybody has bought out the lots there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its actually built in established area. It's already in developed area. I was surprised to found out they were building new homes there. Also, I don't mind putting 3K down. I've been preapproved 2 weeks ago for a loan which is more than enough to cover this house cost. I don't mind if I have to pay 1-2 months before the house is complete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its actually built in established area. It's already in developed area. I was surprised to found out they were building new homes there. Also, I don't mind putting 3K down. I've been preapproved 2 weeks ago for a loan which is more than enough to cover this house cost. I don't mind if I have to pay 1-2 months before the house is complete.

Is this a neighborhood with one builder? If so, I've done this in the past, twice. You'll need to show builder that you are qualified for the loan. I had to put some earnest money down but that was all, I did not have to get a construction loan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, its one builder. Builder has 6 blue prints I can choose from. When I choose the house I want and lot I want, they will build it for me. What are my chances to get a reduced price on brand new home? They got 60 lots but so far only 8 houses were build.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

60 lots only 6 floor plans?

As far as discount, you wont get much on a new house. Better off buying an existing home. If he has a spec house there you might be able to work something on that, but doubtful on one you start building.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea. They got lots of options and etc. You can have exterior out of stone, brick or vinyl. You can add extra rooms and bonus room option with full bathroom on 2nd floor and etc or just ranch without 2nd floor. I'm talking about only 1 blue print. Lots of flexibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Big risk buying on a neighborhood with only 8 homes already built. Upside....lower cost (builder prices go up as the neighborhood gets closer. To done). However, living in a neighborhood with construction and empty lots kind of sucks. I did it once before and lived in a construction zone for several years. Was not fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So Willis had a good game against a poor defense and all of a sudden he is worth 50 million and is guaranteed to be better than Young. LOL I know he looked good in the 3 games he started, and I think he will have success long term, but anyone signing him up for a long term contract for 50 million is taking a huge risk. 
    • Is he really though? Rivera was past his prime and probably shouldn't have even started 2019 so his firing wasn't really unexpected or unwarranted. Rhule lasted two and a half years which was about one year too long in my opinion. Bringing him back that third year certainly wasn't impulsive and I would say Tepper was more patient than he should have been. Wilks finished out that third season and did pretty good but most everyone could see he really wasn't anything more than an intern HC. Bringing him back was not the long term answer so not bringing him back was the correct call. Hiring Reich was a mistake from the beginning and he recognized that fairly quickly. I am sure he knew he was going to catch a lot of sh*t for firing him so quickly ( and boy did he ) but it was absolutely the right thing to do given everything that was going on. The firing may have looked impulsive, but I think it was him recognizing he had royally f*ck up and just dealt with it instead of letting it fester.  That brings us to Canales. 2025 was only his second season and yet he delivered 8 wins and the NFC South title. And while that might not sound great, given the lack of talent and cap space they started with, it's a strong step in the right direction. I couldn't imagine Tepper not being pleased with their progress given the crap the Panthers' have been though under his ownership.
×
×
  • Create New...