Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone Knows How Much Cpi Charges For Surveillance And Surround Sound Installations


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

I have an appointment with CPI sales man this upcoming week. I want surround sound system and my fiance hates it but willing to compromise if not too expensive... I also thinking about getting an extra outside camera but I don't want too pay too much for it. I believe CPI also does only 5 years contracts so they better give me poo load of free stuff. Average marriage in US last only 3 years lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PM me, my cousin's fiance works for CPI & he can hook you up. But I believe they have a basic system where you get so much gear for free & the installation is free.

I got an appointment with CPI salesman this week. Maybe it's your cousin? lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe. They live in Dallas, NC.

CPI & most security systems are a lot cheaper than you'd think.

I hope so. It's a brand new home so installation should take no more than 2 hours. CPI also prewires my entire houses so it only makes sense for it to be cheap lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope so. It's a brand new home so installation should take no more than 2 hours. CPI also prewires my entire houses so it only makes sense for it to be cheap lol

My grandparents had a CPI system put in their new home & it was kinda pricey. Installation was only $99 but they have 20+ ground level windows, sunroom, 8 entry doors, & 2 garage doors. So it just depends on how many sensors you need. Monthly charges aren't bad & if they're wiring your home you can probably hassle for some discounts on equipment. Good luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shouldnt even take two hours. The security system piggy backs off the phone line. When it gets an alarm, it seizes the phone line, using it to call out to the monitoring company. All they're going to have to do is install the panel, sensors, and the accompanying wire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...