Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How exactly is your defensive scheme going to work?


Recommended Posts

I'm more curious about your defense then anything on the team as I'm already sold on your halfbacks and Smith on offense.

Wondering what type of scheme you guys are running on defense this year and what each position on defense is slated to do.

Like I heard it was a Tampa 2 scheme with man to man coverage with your corners?... Not sure exactly how thats going to work out but who is doing what on your defense this year (I don't need the names of the talent as I know most of your defense)... just wondering what the DT, DE, LBs, Secondary do for the most part and how often you guys blitz and what not...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, Meeks has been mum on what he says about it, but we do know that the scheme we're going to run is going to depend on mainly pressure from the front 4, keeping the linebackers in tight zone to recover in case of a run, but I do imagine since we are talking about a Fox team here, you'll still see a lot of 4-3 mixed into it with linebackers still blitzing every now and then. That's pretty much all I can say, if I told you anymore I'd have to kill you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol alright.. just wondered how playing man to man coverage with your corners and playing a zone with the rest of your defense, how it was going to translate. Anymore info would be nice.

I haven't read that anywhere. Link?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hadn't heard really anything about man coverage but from what i can tell is that it is going to be a hybrid of a few things.

pretty much, though, the bulk of the pressure on the QB is going to come from the front four. the secondary is going to be using a very aggressive zone focused on breaking up routes and attacking where the ball goes either disrupting the passes or aggressively hitting and stripping the ball. they are going to have to be quicker and much more aware of what is going on than before. the LBs will be covering the middle of the field controlling the run and helping out with coverage.

nothing earth shatteringly different in the concept but in the way it is going to be carried out and the attention to detail compared to what we have had before will be very different. the aggressiveness will also be a pretty big difference from what i can tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol alright.. just wondered how playing man to man coverage with your corners and playing a zone with the rest of your defense, how it was going to translate. Anymore info would be nice.

is cover 2 man really that hard to understand?

[ame]

[/ame]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt we play a lot of man coverage this year. We don't really have what you would call shut down corners and in man coverage it is vulnerable to the run. Plus if you put the corners in man coverage on the wideouts, you still have to have the linebackers play a short zone to account for extra receivers going to the hole vacated when the corner is taken deep, halfbacks and fullbacks are coming out of the backfield, etc. I wouldn't be surprised if we put man coverage on the slot receiver when we go to the nickel or if we decide to play man specifically on a player like a Fitzgerald, or Randy Moss, TO, etc.

But overall we have largely run a zone scheme for the time that Fox has been here and that is what Meeks does the best. So I figure we will run a cover 2 zone under with a few wrinkles and changes to mix things up each week.

But then again, what do I know?????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...