Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just bought a PC need help with buying monitor.


Dex

Recommended Posts

I will be getting along with the student discount a student gift card totaling $253. I am going to buy a monitor with it and was looking for any insight as to what PC gamers use. The gift card is strictly to Dell so anyone with experience with Dell please post. Looking for around a 20" monitor around the price range of the gift card. Best quality for the price please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure you'll even find a monitor that expensive at that size. So if you really want that size you can have your pick of them pretty much. Recommend a response time of 8ms or better. Other than that Asus, LG, Samsung, and Acer all make good monitors in my experience. I have one of these and love it http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236174. It's 24 inch and still well short of your price limit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure you'll even find a monitor that expensive at that size. So if you really want that size you can have your pick of them pretty much. Recommend a response time of 8ms or better. Other than that Asus, LG, Samsung, and Acer all make good monitors in my experience. I have one of these and love it http://www.newegg.co...N82E16824236174. It's 24 inch and still well short of your price limit.

It's a Dell gift card. So it must be on the Dell site. I would love to have an Acer but they don't sell them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

luckily dell makes great monitors. You should be able to get less than a 5ms response time. I would try to get 1920 x 1080 as that's the fastest growing standard. 24" should be a good size to shoot for. I would explore the web for some dell coupons, dell always has huge sales and promotions. I'm sure the company store is overpriced as hell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dell has good monitors. just do some research on Panel type (TN vs IPS, etc) and response time. Most monitors $200 and up should be 1920x1080 or higher. and typically the higher the contrast ratio the better(However you won't notice a difference after a certain point so the only thing it'll do is burn your eyes out)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://accessories.u...en&sku=320-2736

You want this. LED is superior to LCD.

LCD= Liquid Crystal Dislplay

VS

LED= Light Emitting diode

LED is superior in ever aspect. Crisp lighting, energy efficiency. Each Diode having all the basic color schemes RGB, RBYG. Less effort than LCD. Trust me I used to sell light bulbs and had to know every nook and cranny about lighting and why its better to buy this bulb than that bulb.

I recommend people who are buying a HDTV to buy the LED version instead of the LCD version always. LED will outlast the LCD every single time. Never buy plasma. Once they are fuged you can't fix them.

I'm going by the dollar amount you've provided so here you go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://accessories.u...en&sku=320-2736

You want this. LED is superior to LCD.

LCD= Light Crystal Dislplay

VS

LED= Light Emitting diode

LED is superior in ever aspect. Crisp lighting, energy efficiency. Each Diode having all the basic color schemes RGB, RBYG. Less effort than LCD. Trust me I used to sell light bulbs and had to know every nook and cranny about lighting and why its better to buy this bulb than that bulb.

I recommend people who are buying a HDTV to buy the LED version instead of the LCD version always. LED will outlast the LCD every single time. Never buy plasma. Once they are fuged you can't fix them.

I'm going by the dollar amount you've provided so here you go.

What's the difference between these two then?

http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=us&cs=ussoho1&l=en&sku=320-2736

http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=dhs&cs=19&sku=320-1629&~ck=baynoteSearch&baynote_bnrank=4&baynote_irrank=0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well go with the one that is LED all the way through. There is no such thing as LCD with LED display. That's a farce. You can't have liquid crystal display with Light emitting diode display.

You have to find the true LED display. HDMI is very important for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for a monitor, you don't really need hdmi. The video signal in hdmi is the same digital signal in DVI. The only thing HDMI has different is sound. So unless you're gonna use the shitty built-in speakers on you monitor(if present) then it should make no difference quality wise.

If you're looking for convenience, that's a whole other story. For example, you want to plug your xbox/ps3 into your monitor to play on it or something. Then that comes in handy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...