Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Secondary Concerns


TruCatzFan

Recommended Posts

Even the Lions, with their preceived D-Line dominance, question their own secondary? Every one does. Or at least most teams do?

We are improved. In todays NFL, improvement is a neccessity. We have shown that ability. We just may suprise.

No one is perfect. Yet.

If you cannot see we are improving? I cannot help.

We were terruble two years ago. We were competive last year. We will suprise folks this year. And we will be a force to be reckoned with after that. The improvement is palpable, and it will show itself. Have patience. It is worth the wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an overall team, yes we're improving. We're much better overall than we were two years ago. However, that was due entirely to the dramatic improvement on offense last year with the addition of Cam and Chud. The defense was god awful. Worse than two years ago. A lot worse. Now, injuries definitely played a big role in that, but I still have major concerns about our secondary. My worries about the DL have been eased slightly by adding another veteran DT, but our secondary has to be one of the weakest in the league on paper. Gamble is the only DB we have who would start on most other teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we have a very capable CB in Gamble, and and up and comer in Norman. But we suck? OK.

There are plenty of teams that don't have a number 1, let alone a number 2. Or a 3. We have all three.

Man, you downers get to me. We can improve, but because a precieved weakeness is there, we are doomed. Cool.

I prefer to look at the fact that we have upgraded our roster. Our depth has experience. We are letting go of players with potential to keep players with a proven tack record. We are fighting to make a name or ourselves.

We are better than we were last year at this point. Is that not the goal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an overall team, yes we're improving. We're much better overall than we were two years ago. However, that was due entirely to the dramatic improvement on offense last year with the addition of Cam and Chud. The defense was god awful. Worse than two years ago. A lot worse. Now, injuries definitely played a big role in that, but I still have major concerns about our secondary. My worries about the DL have been eased slightly by adding another veteran DT, but our secondary has to be one of the weakest in the league on paper. Gamble is the only DB we have who would start on most other teams.

Where it comes to our secondary. I can see your trepidation. But Norman is the best CB to come our way since Gamble. That alone should ease your discomfort.

Add in Nakimura and his presence alone should aid our secondary. He is a steadying influence. Believe it or not, that is a big adjustment. He is a communicator. Something that was missed last year.

We are better personell wise, is that so hard to phathom?

Sometimes you just have to take that leap of faith. As a life long Lion fan, I am used to that leap. Panther fans are, spoiled. Success at an early age breeds comtempt. We have seen it.

We are better than last year. We are not as good as we will be. In just a few years, we will be the envy of the league. I can wait. Most folks can't.

That is the main crux of this whole thing. Panther fans, for some strange reason, feel they deserve a winner. A franchise in existance this short of time does not deserve a thing. You have to earn it, We are on the verge of something special. Too bad some of you will miss it, because of your bias towards early success.

Get back to me when the Panthers miss the playoffs for 13 straight years. How many of you will still be here if that happens?

You Panther fans with no NFL knowledge. I will wait. I have waited my whole life for this. And you are unhappy after a couple bad years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deserve has nothing to do with it. This is a forum to discuss the team. If we refuse to acknowledge any issues and just want to talk about sunshine and rainbows, what's the point?

I'm excited about Norman, but he's an unproven rookie. Nakamura will hopefully suck less than Sherrod Martin. That's about the end of my expectations there. Anything more than that would be a welcome surprise. Our secondary is definitely the weak spot on this team now with the addition of Edwards. Our DL should at least be average now with two decent veteran DTs, and a very good DE in Charles Johnson. I also like our rotational pass rushers. Gambe is a very good CB, but everyone else in our secondary is either unproven or spare parts, despite the smoke the front office and coaching staff continues to try to blow up our collective asses about Charles Godfrey. The guy must be a god in the film room, because both the Fox and Rivera staffs have raved about the guy, I've just never seen anything on the field to back it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deserve has nothing to do with it. This is a forum to discuss the team. If we refuse to acknowledge any issues and just want to talk about sunshine and rainbows, what's the point?

I'm excited about Norman, but he's an unproven rookie. Nakamura will hopefully suck less than Sherrod Martin. That's about the end of my expectations there. Anything more than that would be a welcome surprise. Our secondary is definitely the weak spot on this team now with the addition of Edwards. Our DL should at least be average now with two decent veteran DTs, and a very good DE in Charles Johnson. I also like our rotational pass rushers. Gambe is a very good CB, but everyone else in our secondary is either unproven or spare parts, despite the smoke the front office and coaching staff continues to try to blow up our collective asses about Charles Godfrey. The guy must be a god in the film room, because both the Fox and Rivera staffs have raved about the guy, I've just never seen anything on the field to back it up.

See, that is where we differ. I happen to think Godfrey and Nakimura will make a good team. With Norman and Gamble, that makes a pretty solid back 4 to me.

Depends on a lot of things though. Pass rush, LB coverage, zone or man to man, 4-5 WR pass happy team, 2 WR and 2 TE, or any variation there of.

Munny is a nickleback. That really tickles me. And it makes us better. If we can live with Adams mistakes, we can live with Norman and his. Don't know why, just had to throw that in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's say we have a LT for 2026, because we do.  After that, let's say we Ickey could be back and we would have the option of extending Walker.   Don't get me wrong--I LOVE drafting OL.  Teams obviously get desperate for OTs and if they enter the draft without 2 solid tackles, they are almost obligated to reach for a first round OT.  This year, I see 1 OT who is probably worth first-round consideration, and I am not putting him in the top 10 players in the draft.  Lomu, Freeling, Miller, and Proctor, for example, probably and arguably have second-round value.  So why would you reach for an OT in round 1 when you already have starters at both T positions but you have other needs? We do need depth, however, and I think there is decent OT depth that needs development on day 3. They are no slouches, by the way.   Drew Shelton (could drop to round 4): Surrendered 1 sack as Penn State's LT in 2025. 33 3/8" arms.  Pass pro improved every year (4 years--experienced).  "For a team running a zone-heavy scheme that values lateral movement and reach-blocking ability over phone-booth mauling, Shelton has real appeal. He is not a plug-and-play starter, but the athletic tools and the clear year-over-year improvement suggest a player who can develop into a capable starter if a coaching staff invests in his strength base and cleans up his technique. The ceiling depends entirely on how much stronger he can get and whether his feet can stay alive after initial contact."   Austin Barber  (could drop to round 4): I see him as a RT at best and a probable kick inside to Guard where his strengths would switch from secondary to primary tools.  Considering Lewis and Hunt may be gone in a year or two, this would give the Panthers a chance to work him at RT and then move him inside if he is not effective, and there is confidence that G may be his best position. Jude Bowery (4th round projection) was LT on a Boston College OL that was effective in the run game.  Bowery is one of the most athletic OTs in the draft.  His arms are not ideal but not too short (33.75") to play LT.  He surrendered 2 sacks. He is raw, and needs some technical refinement with his hands.  I think he has the best upside and value for this offense.   Dametrious Crownover  TexAM (5th round projection; 35 3/8" arms) is one of the more fascinating developmental tackles in this class because the physical tools are legitimately rare. A strong run blocker who should be better in pass protection with his tools.  "You do not find many 6-7, 336-pound men with that foot speed and who have the athletic background of a converted tight end. When everything clicks, he looks like a starting right tackle in a gap-heavy run scheme, smothering defenders at the point of attack and using his length to erase speed off the edge. The 2024 tape, when he anchored one of the best rushing attacks in the SEC, is the version of Crownover that gets offensive line coaches excited."  THIS is the kind of player our coaches could develop until Moton is done. What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly. The injury clouds the immediate projection. Most ACL recoveries for offensive linemen run nine to twelve months, which means World is likely unavailable for meaningful action well into his rookie season at the earliest. The combine absence removes his chance to reset the narrative physically, and teams will be making decisions almost entirely off pre-injury film and medical evaluations. The contrast between his polished pass sets and his inconsistent run blocking was already a developmental concern, and now those technique issues get deferred further while he rehabs. Isaiah World  (Oregon, injured ACL in playoffs, 5th round projection--could slide to 6th).  World will not play much if at all in 2026, which is why he might fall.  For the Panthers' purposes, however, this would give the OL coaches time to work with him. "What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly." "That said, the investment argument isn't crazy for the right organization. This is still a tackle with first-round portal grades and the kind of athletic profile that doesn't just disappear. A team with patience and a strong offensive line room can afford to stash World on the roster, let him develop his lower-body power and pad-level consistency during the recovery process, and potentially unlock a starting-caliber right tackle somewhere in his second or third season. The path is longer now, but the destination hasn't changed for a scout willing to bet on the physical tools." You get the idea. If we do not need the OT immediately, draft one later and develop him as depth and for next season.  Most college players drafted in round 1 were not first rounders if they had entered the draft the year before,  so why not grab a player with upside?      
    • Its never the QBs fault, so if we get a new WR and he looks bad he must be a bust
    • Based on what? Its certainly not his in game coaching prowess. 
×
×
  • Create New...