Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anybody know what the Panthers game plan was?


pstall

Recommended Posts

We give Tolbert big money and he wasn't even utilized ONE time today, Chud is way too creative for his own good, his play callung goes from a simple handoff to a 30+ yard bomb on 2nd 6-8 in the blink of an eye. it's strange, annoying, and too god damned gimmicky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

at times, you can be too creative and too quickly get away from what works. interesting article on OK State's offense and how it's simple yet very effective due to the reads.

they may run the same play 6 straight times until the d changes a look or stops it. i think what we think is being smart by "mixing it up" can at times do more harm than good.

i will have to go back and watch the game tape but i don't think the Panthers went back to any one play that worked. it was no ebb and flow.

first games you are never really sure what you have. i'm sure they will tweak some things. i just hope they stop reading the press etc and eat some humble pie and just play ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gameplan was to lose so it can be a valuable lesson. Then lose the next 3 games so we will be viewed as a bad team. Then coaches will start preparing properly for games and call logical situational plays so we then will win the next 12 games dominating teams. We will then be first in our division and make it to the playoffs. Play NFC Championship. Win. Then Superbowl. Win. I know this becuase Rivera told me his complete Gameplan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've liked him since his rookie year as a prospect, but when he's been asked to play in a large capacity, he has simply not done well.   He does not really add anything, rather muddies up the room.  Fant is TERRIBLE as a blocker, a pure receiving TE.   Let's just put Tremble aside since he's PUP (although I still like him as a TE2, but yeah he's not our future starter)... Sanders has already shown better receiving skills than a Fant and has a nice ceiling.  Not to mention, he's got in-line run blocking skills.  I really want to see what he's capable of this year.  Also has a year+ experience now in Canales' offense, not to mention legit chemistry with Bryce. And after Sanders, I also imagine our staff is waiting to see how Mitchell Evans looks in camp as he's got the in-line blocking skills.  If he looks fully capable of filling in behind Sanders, then I don't see a need.  Overall, keep an eye out on early August moves.  They are usually soft indicators of how staff's view their rookie late rounders and roster overall.  This is a wait and see what the market presents and how they think their unit looks in camp.  
    • Every team has different needs of the backup QB.   On some teams a young hopeful makes sense and on others an old worn out dude makes sense.  We are a little more in the in-between IMO where you probably would prefer a Fields, Pickett, Howell type IMO.   So a young disappoint that you there is still some hail mary hope in.....given BY essentially was benched both seasons for performance (I know that's not the official line going into Seattle but I think most would agree he got a break and should of been benched later that year).  I know we want Bryce to be the week 17 guy all season this upcoming year.  But it's still in the reasonable thought process that the other dude could show back up. 
    • I wouldn't mind it if they bring him in cheap for competition. I would imagine he would vie for the 3rd TE spot with the rookie. 
×
×
  • Create New...