Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"There is always next week"

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

Are people really ignorant to believe that Rivera is a defeatist kind of guy with a passive attitude??

Seriously?????

I have heard him described as intense, scary, intimidating but not defeatist and passive. I guess that is where taking something in the context of what we already know would apply.

He looks more like a players coach. Doesn't look like a military son to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

funny the clown that has a john fox avatar says that rivera needs to show more emotion.

wanna know who to take seriously around here? process of elimination starts right there.

Dnt hate .

Foxy is a more aggressive and emotional coach than RR. The coach whos not known to be a great preacher unlike RR, but somehow gave a great speech during a halftime at SF down 28 points and came back and won that game.

Winning speaks louder than assuming a coach is getting the message to the players' head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

you must have forgotten the part where i don't take you seriously.

won't be too long before the people who don't put you on ignore only do it to point and laugh...or those other melodramatic emo chicken littles who overreact over the littlest things. i'm sure you're real cool with that crowd. they probably don't even care that you spell like a 3rd grader. in fact they probably think thats awesome about you...that you just don't care how dumb you sound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
xav8tor Newbie

xav8tor

Posted
Posted

And a bigger issue is again ignored. Why do we put so much emphasis on what we hear in soundbites?

Because thats all we have? If so, we don't have much.

Yes, other than the W/L column, that is exactly what we have to learn about the attitudes of coaches and players. It was a public statement in reference to the game and it does smack of "it is what it is," which makes many fans want to puke their guts out, and for good reason. EVERY game is important, and a needless wasted opportunity to advance should be fully explained and addressed....not just to the owner and players, but to fans, many of whom pay more than the average monthly car payment just to go to a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...