Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I Formation....


Zod

Recommended Posts

Cam can throw the football. He is capable of lining up under center, dropping back, and throwing the football. I know. I have seen him do it, and he is capable of doing it well.

Why we're so paralyzingly scared of running a conventional offense is beyond me. I knew from the very first time we tried to run the option last night, when the defender stayed home to hit Cam regardless of what he did with the pitch, that NY was ready for it.

Yet Chud was like so enamored with the medias obsession with it he refused to burn it.

Our offense is capable of being run conventionally. We have a good QB who can throw the ball very well and does so when he isn't trying to force something to happen when we dig a hole for ourselves like we did last night.

We have good receiving weapons. We have good RBs.

We have an OL that wouldn't have looked nearly as bad last night if 95% of the plays we ran involved some delay in the backfield prior to taking off.

We are capable of running a normal offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...