Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rob Ryan refers to Panther as running "some sort of junior high offense"


IGSaint

Recommended Posts

The Cowboys want turnovers so much, they’re going to stop calling them turnovers.

Defensive coordinator Rob Ryan joked Friday in his weekly media session that he now calls turnovers “takeovers.”

“Obviously, we’re not good at getting turnovers. We changed the name,” he said. “So I think we’re going to do much better. We’re getting takeovers, so we’re ready to go.”

The Cowboys have only four takeaways, an interception and three fumble recoveries, including a muffed punt.

“We’ve got a sound defense, we’ve got great players, we’re not turning people loose,” Ryan said. “The takeovers are coming, and that’s what we’re going to do.”

Read more here: http://sportsblogs.star-telegram.com/cowboys/#storylink=cpy

http://sportsblogs.star-telegram.com/cowboys/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rob Ryan says don’t worry. He can handle the option.

Or whatever else the Carolina Panthers throw out this week to try to spring quarterback Cam Newton.

“People get turned loose all the time. You don’t see that happen with us, and you’re not going to see it happen with us,” the Cowboys defensive coordinator said Friday in his weekly media session. “So this guy runs some college offense or a high school offense or a junior high offense, we’re going to be sound, we’re going to get after their (stuff). It doesn’t matter what they run – dive option, zone read, whatever. We’re just going to get after their (stuff) and make them punt.”

Read more here: http://sportsblogs.star-telegram.com/cowboys/#storylink=cpy

Well, he's right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds about right. Going to be interesting to see how the Oline holds up without Kalil, and how Cam will run the pro style running we need so much without him. God help us.

I'd still rather Chud do it and help Cam grow and progress; he has the ability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe an extra dose of gadget plays to go with it as well......might see a flea flicking Statue of Liberty Mountaineer.

i bet that's what he spent the whole bye week trying to work out. that and watching a lot of kid's football movies for inspiration.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On NFLN they're talking about we're not the only team who's been running the "read option" as a base. Washington runs some of it, and Minnesota has run it. They even talked about how the "read option" has hurt Adrian Peterson's performance and limited him this season. It made me wonder why ANYONE would run it if it isnt getting great results this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...