Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Happens if DeAngelo Williams is Cut or Traded?


ZackAttack23

Recommended Posts

really don't need anybody, unless a cheap-ass free agent that could complement the two guys we have now is a better option than what we have a third-string.

spend money and resources on fixing the offensive line the backs we keep will look better, and so will our quarterback, and all three phases will feed off of each other like the symbiosis you expect to see on a winning football team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

really don't need anybody, unless a cheap-ass free agent that could complement the two guys we have now is a better option than what we have a third-string.

spend money and resources on fixing the offensive line the backs we keep will look better, and so will our quarterback, and all three phases will feed off of each other like the symbiosis you expect to see on a winning football team.

If we have a better Offensive Coordinator next year, it will be different. Who knows, we might ACTUALLY use our RB's! But yes we do need to fix our OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

draft one in the 6th or 5th at highest. We need to stop putting so much towards running backs we dont use. We would be fine without DWill where were at since we do have Tolbert

I agree for the most part about what you said, except what we do with RB's currently in our play-calling won't matter with new coaching staff next year if we get one. Also Tolbert can play RB or FB. Though we could use a better blocking FB, Tolbert can play RB, TE, or FB. That's why I think we keep Tolbert at FB. Hope I didn't confuse you lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...