Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Whisenhunt to SD as OC


UNCrules2187

Recommended Posts

Can any of you honestly convince me why Hue Jackson is a good hire? Why? because you know his name?

Do you guys think so highly of him that you'd want him to be the Panthers HC? Because that's whats going to happen if Rivera starts out 0-3 next year.

Track record of success...

Head coaching experience...

Right fit system wise...

Aggressive attacking style...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can any of you honestly convince me why Hue Jackson is a good hire? Why? because you know his name?

Do you guys think so highly of him that you'd want him to be the Panthers HC? Because that's whats going to happen if Rivera starts out 0-3 next year.

If we start out 0-3 and JR/Gett pull the plug, then I'd be fine with Hue as an interim. He would be far from my first choice longer term, but as an interim in that situation, he'd be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we start out 0-3 and JR/Gett pull the plug, then I'd be fine with Hue as an interim. He would be far from my first choice longer term, but as an interim in that situation, he'd be fine.

I'm not going to knock Hue for his coaching failure in Oakland. That team is a mess organizationally and there is a reason why they need a new coach every 2 years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just a winner? He went 6-9 last year. Just because a guy got carried to the SB by elite surrounding talent doesn't mean much. How did Nick Files pan out after catching lightning on a bottle?
    • Hurts is an elite threat with his legs though. He's gonna stress an opposing DC a lot more than Brock Purdy.
    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
×
×
  • Create New...