Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corvo, McBain, Murphy all on the block?


Stumpy

Recommended Posts

Via thefourthline.com

Sources have told TFP that Rutherford is looking to acquire a top-four defenseman, though a deal is not imminent.

However, with a surplus of defensemen on the roster, Rutherford could deal others, like Corvo and McBain, for assets that could be used to package for a more potent defenseman.

Oh, word?

The Coyote are shopping Yandle, though a deal may not be completed until the April 3 trade deadline, at the earliest, and Phoenix GM Don Maloney would want a top young talent packaged as part of a deal in return.

Maloney would undoubtedly want Ryan Murphy, the Hurricanes' first-round pick in 2011, as part of a package, however it's unclear what other pieces could be included that the Coyotes would be interested in.

The Hurricanes will not consider moving star forward Jeff Skinner, and that might be where the conversation ends.

How is Skinner even still mentioned in trade fodder? It will not happen, not for anybody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been saying this all along.

Murphy, McBain, 2013 First

Faulk - Gleason

Pitkanen - Yandle

Corvo - Harrison

I'd be stoke if this happened, considering we are on course to pick in the mid to late rds for the 2013 entry - and the talent drops off well below what Yandle can do.

I'd punch a baby if we traded Skinner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its time for Rutherford and Karmanos to put their money where there mouth is. You say you have the money, you say your willing to do what it takes to get a guy you want.

This one is gonna hurt worse than losing Sutter. But if you make this move, we can win a cup this year.

Our top 2 lineliness are unstoppable. Cam has enough magic left I'm the tank and we finally have a capable back up for him.

Solidify this defense and we can beat any team in the league any given night. Do this and bring a cup back to Raleigh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Realistically, I think the Canes could get Yandle for Murphy, McBain, LaRose and a 2013 first

By playoff time, the Canes could roll with this lineup.

Tlusty - E. Staal - Semin

Skinner - J. Staal - Ruutu

Bowman - Jokinen - Dwyer

Nodl - Brent - Wallace

Westgarth

Faulk - Gleason

Pitkanen - Yandle

Corvo - Harrison

Sanguinetti

Ward

Ellis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...