Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BIGSYKE'S DRAFT: A look at the future from my perspective.


BigSyke

Recommended Posts

Draft.-Trade back in first for extra 2nd. Trade back in 4th for extra 5th.(most realistic options to me)

1.Xavier Rhodes(cb)-(Alt-Trufant-Banks-Slay)

2.Quinton Patton(wr)

2.Larry Warford(og)

4.Shamarko Thomas(ss)(Alt-S.Williams)

5.Brennan Williams(ot)

5.T.J Barnes(dt)(Alt-G.Hodges)

6.Kwame Geathers(dt)

6.Caleb Sturgis(k)

6.Mark Harrison(wr)

In House Free Agents Resigned

1.Dwan Edwards

2.Jordan Senn

3.Captain Munnerlyn

Free Agency

1.Jason Campbell(qb)

2.Greg Toler(cb)

3.Dustin Keller(te)

3.Wallace Gilberry(de)

Undrafted Free Agency

1.(Already made a whole fuggin thread about it. lol!)

Note:(Also I'm sure there will be some no brainer cuts and restructures to get under the cap. I also picked young free agents that shouldn't cost that much, but could be effective players)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would be a hell of a draft but I don't think Xavier Rhodes will be on the board if we trade back. He may not make it to our pick at 14.

The first 5 picks would be potential starters plus the kicker Sturgis. I wouldn't be mad at all with this haul.

I would need to see how that trade back scenario played out though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Honestly, the guy does a TON of good research. His videos are always high quality and his insight is always stellar.  This video however changed my mind...dramatically about the draft.  Anyone who's seen my opinions knows Im a all in BPA guy, HOWEVER, this kind of changed my mind...Im now a BPA...at position of value dictated by the board.  A lot of words to say, weighted average is important. We all all know that having a good qb on a rookie contract is important, but what about a good edge...or reciever...or tackle?  THOSE things make a different and this opened my eyes to that.  With that said, not that I think we SHOULD go receiver in the first, HOWEVER, IT DOES MAKE SENSE.  If you have good young recievers coming in on rookie contracts, then you have more to build the rest of the roster at a lower cost.  If we were a team loaded at Receiver then things would be different, however, we only truly have 2 reliable WRs, so would another Receiver be a bad pick...I actually dont think so now based on value going forward.  Its just something to consider for everyone.    
    • Yeah, it's fool's gold. Darnold always had the tools. He just needed a tram with an elite D, a top 5 WR, and a Super Bowl MVP RB to carry him so he wouldn't be asked to press where he becomes a turnover machine. Darnold settled in once he was in a situation where he could just be a very talented game manager. People try to tell themselves Bryce can do that without realizing that Darnold still forces the D to respect the throws he can make that the coaches would rather he not attempt where as Bryce simply doesn't have the physical ability to force that respect opening up other opportunities. Like Parcells said leading up to the draft that based on his physical tool set "he better walk on water". What he was politely trying to say is that Bryce simply doesn't have an NFL physical tool set.
    • Got home in time to see Halls goal in the 3rd. Saw replays of Staal and LeCuck dropping gloves on the faceoff loved that! Playoff Freddie entered the building  woo! Hope to see the full replay on Fandual.
×
×
  • Create New...