Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New logo leaks?


Katweiser

Recommended Posts

I grew up in Florida as a kid and was a big dolphin fan. Still have some attachment to the team. I think its Ok, but Ive seen some enough bad prototype ones out there that probably scared me into thinking its "OK" wish they left it alone to be honest....I like the Jags unis, those definitely look better...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a_dsxsrcyaaieyt.png

This is what was supposed to be the original leak. Its a little different than the newer one as far as the colors and sun. Ive been hearing reports that the official one will indeed have an up turned tail.......I think the newer one looks better than this, but that upturned tail is too passive for an NFL logo. This one looks like a sign you see on top of a beach store that sells beach balls and suntan oil....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bring back the helmet

Yeah, its funny how so many Dolphin fans hate the helmet. They say its too cartoon like. So they want the dolphin to look more real.....at the same time, they want it to look aggressive and that's just impossible. If you are going to make a dolphin look aggressive, its not going to look like a real dolphin. If you make it look like a real dolphin, its gonna be too passive of a logo for a NFL team,....at least in my opinion. With that, Im perfectly fine with a cartoon looking logo...Its almost a cartoon situation having a dolphin as a NFL mascot, LOL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You joke, but it can always be worse. He might walk with a limp or need assistance. Different sport, but Lonzo Ball couldn't even walk up steps a year after his injury.
    • I mean... a lot of the information that could've helped set better expectations has always been out there: There was no RB on the team under contract for the 2025 - 2026 season except for Miles Sanders. The team did not have a second round pick going into the 2025 season due to the trade for Young. Chuba's extension did not happen until the beginning of November. Jonathon Brooks was the clear RB1 in the class with a massive gap between RB1 & RB2. Example: Dane Brugler had Brooks as RB1, overall #48; Blake Corum was RB2, #81 overall. The Giants held pick #47 and had just lost Saquon Barkley to the Eagles in free agency. They were going to take Brooks had the Panthers not jumped in front of them. So if we're framing things with that context: Chuba was expected to be RB1 Miles (at the time) was RB2 Brooks was essentially RB3, stashed for rehab in 2024 with a long runway. The original injury occurred Nov 2023 while the re-injury occurred December 2024. That is right in the high-risk window for recurrence, especially in explosive athletes. The fact that it also happened on a non-contact play suggests possible biomechanical issues such as muscle imbalance, rather than a failed surgery (or bad decision-making).   NFL teams invest heavily in medically vetting prospects. If there had been a clear red flag in imaging or recovery markers, the team is going to find it. This sucks and the Panthers have sucked, yes, but this wasn't blind optimism or malpractice by the front office. It was a calculated decision based on the roster, draft capital, positional scarcity, etc.
    • Yep, but they can all rotate with Brown, Brown and Robinson (sounds like a law firm). Can't continue to have Derrick Brown out there for 90+ percent of the defensive snaps. An injury was bound to happen. 
×
×
  • Create New...